Anti-vaxxers are more dangerous than you thought
"Measles vaccine protects against other deadly diseases," proclaims an article in ScienceInsider. In reality, the protection is indirect: Getting measles disposes you to getting other potentially fatal diseases over the next several years. Evidently, measles, unlike, for example, whooping cough, not only weakens your immune system but also makes it "forget," so you may even contract a disease that you already had and thought you were immune to. (As an aside, though it was supposedly impossible, I contracted mumps twice, as diagnosed both times by a physician. I now wonder whether I had contracted measles between the two cases of mumps.)
As described in the ScienceInsider article, Michael Mina and colleagues at the Emory University School of Medicine demonstrated a correlation between a child's getting measles and subsequently dying of other diseases. Specifically, they showed that children who survive measles are especially vulnerable to contracting a fatal illness for an average of approximately 2.5 years after the measles infection. The result held true both before and after the widespread use of the measles vaccine. The researchers found no such vulnerability among children who had contracted whooping cough, so the result is apparently specific to measles.
Vaccination had practically eliminated measles from the United States by 2000. Since 2013 or so, we have experienced hundreds of cases, largely if not entirely due to the anti-vaccination movement (see, for example, MMR vaccine controversy, which details the fraudulent but influential paper by Andrew Wakefield). Little did we know that the anti-vaxxers have put children in danger of contracting not only measles (a serious disease on its own, incidentally), but also other serious and potentially fatal diseases as well.
11 Comments
Just Bob · 9 May 2015
paulc_mv · 9 May 2015
This is somewhat tangential, but being able to "forget" antibodies could have major applications, such as in transplant tolerance, where a history of blood transfusions and previous transplants can increase the likelihood of rejecting a new transplant.
So what is measles doing in this case? It seems almost impossible. I know you can irradiate the immune system and replace it, but I have never heard of editing out immunities. Do people understand the mechanism in measles?
Mike Elzinga · 9 May 2015
It seems that we can, in principle, find the means to inoculate against many diseases; and, with proper public health standards and policies, generate herd immunity to disease by educating the public about all sorts of health issues.
However, in practice, it appears that we can't seem to generate herd immunity to stupidity, ignorance, and malicious mischief when it comes to any such public policies.
There doesnât appear to be any type of "vaccine" for virulent stupidity and demagoguery in a democratic society where a solitary, post-modernist demagogue is free, within a few months, to pass him/herself off as an "expert" of equal weight to thousands of experienced experts who have been developing their expertise through direct experience and research for well over a century.
Stupidity and demagoguery will probably kill off most of humanity long before microbes and viruses do. I don't know how to judge whether or not that would be better for the planet.
Yardbird · 9 May 2015
W. H. Heydt · 9 May 2015
grendelsfather · 9 May 2015
harold · 10 May 2015
Just Bob · 10 May 2015
Yardbird · 10 May 2015
Is there any indication that getting measles can reduce immunity from vaccines for other diseases?
eric · 11 May 2015
harold · 11 May 2015