Whoa, the Disco Institute has the Anecdote to Faulty Thinking!
Imagine that.
The above is the copy I got in an email.
Somebody spilled the beans, alas, and the corrected version with "antidote" has been posted.
Too late, we've gotten our belly laugh! Nyah Nyah, Discovery Institute, no memory hole is big enough to make this laughable faux pas go away.
34 Comments
NoName · 12 March 2014
Well, you can't really expect them to be comfortable with spelling. You know, what with the witchcraft and all.
gnome de net · 12 March 2014
Corrected it before they were forced to refutiate it.
Just Bob · 12 March 2014
Quick, somebody ask FL: Did the CSC make a MISTAKE in using 'anecdote'? Were they dead, incontrovertibly WRONG to use that word? Or does it have a meaning that we materialist atheists are too dumb to know (as do 'bijection' or 'incompatible')?
They do pray about these things before they post them, don't they? If they do, then their prayer seems about as effective as praying to 'heal' a long-severed limb. Or if they don't, why not? Could they suspect it would be wasted breath?
https://me.yahoo.com/a/JxVN0eQFqtmgoY7wC1cZM44ET_iAanxHQmLgYgX_Zhn8#57cad · 12 March 2014
Anecdote, antidote, both words were intelligently designed (not really, of course), and we know that's all that matters.
Quit holding them to our pathetic level of detail. We're just so pathetic that they don't even dream of rising to our level.
Glen Davidson
Karen S. · 12 March 2014
But our system of education in English need no "anecdote." Thanks for learning us real good, Disco Tute!
Mike Elzinga · 12 March 2014
DavidK · 12 March 2014
A Freudian slip of the first degree. They really did mean to say anecdote and it slipped out from their (always) unconscious minds.
Prometheus68 · 12 March 2014
With a bit more genetic drift, the word might have evolved to "anecdesignproponentsistsote".
Ron Okimoto · 12 March 2014
All this time it was Intelligent Resign and nobody bothered to correct it. IR for science outside the visible range.
Robert Byers · 12 March 2014
Spelling?! Thats why ID is wRONG?? if the spelling was right would it make ID right? what's the rules in this intellectual confrontation??
Has anyone seen this guy's cartoon show? I have't for a while but woow THIS guy has a say in right and wrong about edication on origin sjows? then why not all the people? why not a general vote or decision making in the governments of states and towns etc??
Censorship is more the result of a dumbed down society then freedom to confront and contend amongst students.
so the guy who has access to the public wants to control what the public hears. is the Crimea? even there they get a vote!
david.starling.macmillan · 12 March 2014
DS · 12 March 2014
Keelyn · 12 March 2014
diogeneslamp0 · 12 March 2014
Childermass · 12 March 2014
If sitting on the fence on creation/evolution and saw this article, it would make me far more sympathetic to the creationists.
We have the creationists beat on this thing called evidence. We have no need to make a childish gripe that there is a Discovery Institute document with a misspelling. And it a dangerous accusation. There are numerous smart, educated people who are not the greatest spellers. And plenty of people who could state a spelling in a spelling bee and still manage to misspell it. Think of Pres. Obama who recently spelled "respect" wrong much to the delight of right wingers. So, if someone on our side misspells a word, does that mean that "evolutionists" are stupid or ignorant? If you say no, then you are a hypocrite for making this post.
I expect better from the Panda's Thumb -- far, far better.
robert van bakel · 12 March 2014
I do have anecdotal evidence that the cause of RB's dyslalia is an over association with a group of people suffering dysphasia. A quick trip to AnswersInGenitals and Ham, or UD with Born Again 77, George and Co are my examples of the aforementioned anecdotal evidence. Happily the anecdotal antidote to this life in dystopia is a healthy dose of what your eyes can see, what your mind can uncover, and the insights you can share; revealed truth is an oxymoron.
david.starling.macmillan · 12 March 2014
diogeneslamp0 · 13 March 2014
Rolf · 13 March 2014
My initial reaction when reading the o.p. was "I hope nobody spills the beans" but it seems my prayer was too late in the queue. What's wrong with having a gratis laugh?
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkfz_ydidIaI_m6NKfKsDtTO1rKHmi8B-c · 13 March 2014
DS · 13 March 2014
gnome de net · 13 March 2014
Whenever I encounter errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar, or other evidence of poor proofreading, I tend to question the accuracy of what the author wants to tell me.
After all, if I can find obvious mistakes in the presentation of new information, how can I be sure that the information itself is without similar mistakes that are not obvious?
Dave Thomas · 13 March 2014
diogeneslamp0 · 13 March 2014
Just you wait, you damn atheists. Darwinism is finished... some day soon, science will be dominated by Intelligent Design proponents. And when you take your kid to the hospital because he drank a bottle of Drano or got bitten by a black widow spider, you'll thank God that an ID believer like Dr. Michael Egnor is there to order the nurses to keep searching until they find the anecdote!
https://me.yahoo.com/a/JxVN0eQFqtmgoY7wC1cZM44ET_iAanxHQmLgYgX_Zhn8#57cad · 13 March 2014
https://me.yahoo.com/a/JxVN0eQFqtmgoY7wC1cZM44ET_iAanxHQmLgYgX_Zhn8#57cad · 13 March 2014
Karen S. · 14 March 2014
Should we now teach this controversy in English class?
Kevin B · 14 March 2014
k.e.. · 14 March 2014
A faux pas indeed. Just imagine if there was a antidote to cure lying liars for creationism...... DI press releases might read "ID is actually creationism we were just joshing all this time" or "DI admits ID is not science it's a scam to get around the Constitution and teach religion in science classes" or even "DI finds antidote to science still years away, appeals for more donations"
SLC · 14 March 2014
https://me.yahoo.com/a/UZTyNgIV2NoJdpo6Kaxq0gI.KQ--#90715 · 14 March 2014
Robert,
Evolvolutionists needed that one. Badly!!!
Dave is a happy camper now.
But alas, the envelope keeps arriving on his desk, day in and day out. Life is a beach!
Then off they go on the net trashing the good name of information. Poor information. The lonely outcast. Everybody knows you but can't acknowledge your presence.
Hush, hush. The info thugs...er I mean info police....uh, i mean those particular scientists, you know...er
Hush, dammit.
Rikki_Tikki_Taalik · 15 March 2014
david.starling.macmillan · 15 March 2014
Henry J · 15 March 2014