... because then I could go to
Minicon 46 and attend this bit of programming:
Creation Museum Slideshow - 8:30 PM Saturday
John Scalzi shares photos and stories from his visit to "the very best monument to an enormous load of horseshit that you could possibly ever hope to see." Hilarity ensues.
John Scalzi, Rob Callahan moderating
Here's Scalzi's original report on the visit. One memorable extract:
Here's how to understand the Creation Museum:
Imagine, if you will, a load of horseshit. And we're not talking just your average load of horseshit; no, we're talking colossal load of horsehit. An epic load of horseshit. The kind of load of horseshit that has accreted over decades and has developed its own sort of ecosystem, from the flyblown chunks at the perimeter, down into the heated and decomposing center, generating explosive levels of methane as bacteria feast merrily on vintage, liquified crap. This is a Herculean load of horseshit, friends, the likes of which has not been seen since the days of Augeas.
...
And this is, in sum, the Creation Museum. $27 million has purchased the very best monument to an enormous load of horseshit that you could possibly ever hope to see.
Just so.
Hat tip to Scalzi his own self
32 Comments
Ray Martinez · 15 April 2011
But Ham and the Young Earth Fundies and their Museum accept the main claim of Darwinism: species mutability. In fact, the museum displays lots of evolution to account for species.
Look what Darwin hath wrought!
Mike Elzinga · 15 April 2011
And now Faux News is going to add this pile of horseshit to its own pile of horseshit. Yippie!
With so much shit, they should be able to make the “Ark Encounter” a real olfactory experience.
mrg · 15 April 2011
Oh yeah. I was working out at the town gym this morning, and recently they remodeled and put in a row of large panel displays. I usually find them distracting while I'm trying to work up a sweat, but when FOX flashed up "CREATION MUSEUM", various quotes about what a silly trashload the place is, and then Ken Ham's smiling face -- I think he gives me the creeps worse when he's smiling -- I wondered: "WHAT is this?" No sound on the gym TVs, no subtitles on the commercial.
Thanks to the magic carpet of Google, now I know, sorry I asked. Ham's playing the "everybody's picking on us" card. Which I guess is a fairly good pitch on their target audience.
fnxtr · 15 April 2011
As Skip Roper and Mojo Nixon once exclaimed: "A turd so big, it had other, little turds orbiting around it!"
Flint · 15 April 2011
Is this the same John Scalzi who wrote Old Man's War? If so, a wonderful writer. If not, then we have TWO John Scalzis who are wonderful writers.
anon · 15 April 2011
You do know snow is in the forecast here in MN, don't you?
Flint · 15 April 2011
Oops, should have followed more of the links. It is indeed the same man. I have all his books, and they are entertaining as hell.
Karen S. · 15 April 2011
Wolfhound · 15 April 2011
Hee-hee! I contributed to the fund he set up a few years ago to visit that pile of horseshit. He donated all of it to NCSE, I believe. :)
Dave Luckett · 15 April 2011
Yes, it is the same John Scalzi. I read what he writes, wishing I'd said that.
And if I were in the United States - hell, if I were in the western hemisphere - I'd so be there for that.
KL · 15 April 2011
I dunno-I went to foxnews and searched for "museum" and got this:
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/04/12/icelands-penis-museum-finally-gets-human-specimen/
but nothing about Ken Ham's museum.
OgreMkV · 15 April 2011
Yeah, Scalzi and Stevenson (Cryptonomicron) have some truly elegant turns of phrase. I particularly liked one of the introductions of a character in Cryptonomicron, that described every living thing as a stupendous badass, because anything that wasn't a stupendous badass was eaten by a stupendous badass.
Flint · 15 April 2011
Stephenson seems to toss those things offhand, and some of them are really neat. In Cryptonomicon, he described a fax machine as "sounding like a bird in a coffee can". Yeah, I wish I could think those things up too.
Dale Husband · 15 April 2011
John Kwok · 15 April 2011
Scott F · 15 April 2011
I browsed through Scalzi's photo tour. It's more extensive than PZ's tour reporting. I hadn't been aware of the actual timeline of creation before. It's a little hard to read, but it looks like Noah's flood happened in about 2400BC (the "Catastrophe" part), and the Towel of Babel about 100 years later (the "Confusion" part).
That's pretty impressive, in that the ancient Egyptians, Minoans, Chinese, Indians, and Sumerians don't seem to have noticed this global flood. You would think that the Egyptian pyramids would have shown some signs of inundation.
It's also impressive that within 100 to 150 years, 8 people from the Ark managed to rebuild the city of Babel enough to build a tower to rival God himself. Let's see. Maybe someone has already done this. But if we assume a generation of 20 years, starting with 4 women, assuming about 20,000 people in the city of Babel (a society large enough to support a major building project on the scale of the Pyramids), then every woman would have had to give birth to 10 to 30 children every 20 years over a fertile lifetime of 100 years. (Assuming an infant mortality rate of about 50% (a rough estimate for the Bronze age), and half of the children were males.) Assuming an actual fertile life span of about 30 years, and we're looking at about 50-100 kids per woman in just under 15 years, or about 3 to 6 kids every year per woman. Just rough back-of-the-napkin estimates.
Rather impressive. I had no idea that Noah's family was so damn fertile. :-)
Scott F · 15 April 2011
Hmm... My statistics are probably very rusty. :-)
Henry J · 15 April 2011
SWT · 15 April 2011
raven · 16 April 2011
Mike Elzinga · 16 April 2011
Stanton · 16 April 2011
John Vanko · 16 April 2011
Speaking of really big floods and really big wooden boats - did you know that Noah had really big wooden cranes?
Oh yeah.
Here's what AiG said last week, and I quote, "Even in the small details, the AiG web team strives to preserve biblical accuracy as far as possible. In this case, the web banner for the Ark Encounter site upholds what we believe to be an accurate portrayal of the Ark’s construction."
Please note the giant cranes at arkencounter.com (I don't think the Egyptians, or the Romans, or Medieval Europeans, built wooden cranes that big! Maybe they did, and I just don't have good engineering sense.)
Even in this small detail, apparently, AiG is striving to preserve biblical accuracy by an accurate portrayal of the Ark's construction.
I wonder if they will use such wooden cranes in their reconstruction? I wonder if their reconstruct will float? Will it be seaworthy in super hurricane seas? I hope so.
RBH · 16 April 2011
RBH · 16 April 2011
Karen S. · 16 April 2011
That was one hilarious slideshow, and all the comments were great too. Now if I could only stop laughing!
Flint · 16 April 2011
David Fickett-Wilbar · 17 April 2011
John Kwok · 17 April 2011
Here's the most memorable opening line I've come across in any novel I have read published since 1980, William Gibson's "Neuromancer", published appropriately enough in 1984:
"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel."
You can read an extended excerpt from the first chapter here:
http://www.williamgibsonbooks.com/books/neuromancer.asp
W. H. Heydt · 17 April 2011
Paul Burnett · 17 April 2011
stevaroni · 17 April 2011