Baraminologists deny 'hoax' charges, threaten legal action

Posted 24 December 2009 by

↗ The current version of this post is on the live site: https://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/12/baraminologists.html

Apparently the charge made on Panda's Thumb that the Institute for Noachian Studies Fellows Dr. Orbin S. Thicke and Rev. Bob-Bob Lee's ground-breaking approach to determining the taxonomic level of the Biblical "kinds" on Noah's Ark is no more than a hoax perpetrated by Dr. Boli has struck a nerve, perhaps even two nerves. According to this story, spotted by Dr. Boli's clipping service, crack baraminological researchers Thicke and Lee have vehemently denied that their forthcoming book, promised for publication in February 2043, is a hoax.
"We have established a methodology," Dr. Thicke said. "A top-quality study will take some time, which is why we have given ourselves thirty-four years to complete it. There is no need for critics to weigh in before the study is even finished." "We knew we would face opposition from the satanic atheistic communistic Islamofascist spawn of hell," added the Rev. Bob-Bob. "But a true scientist follows the facts wherever they lead him, as long as they do not lead him outside the pages of Genesis."
It's of note also that another set of theoreticians has weighed in:
Meanwhile, a spokesman for Answers in Hesiod, a classical pagan fundamentalist think tank, strongly condemned the projected study for failing to take into account the scientifically valid theory that Chaos, Gaia, and Eros arose spontaneously from nothing.
Let a thousand flowers bloom for a moment and then die and be woven into leis for ... um. Oh. Sorry. Wrong fantasy. What was it someone once said about open minds and falling brains? Panda's Thumb spokesbear Professor Steve Steve was unavailable for comment due to a prior commitment with some bamboo stalks in eggnog. But I heard him exclaim as he trundled out of sight, "Happy holidays to all, and to all a good night!"

64 Comments

fnxtr · 24 December 2009

So, is that, like, a metahoax, or something?

Mike Z · 24 December 2009

Right...this reads like a hoax hoax.

John Harshman · 24 December 2009

I still say that Lee & Thicke are hoaxers. If they had really intended to complete their study, they wouldn't have announced a publication date that came after the Rapture. If they're good Christians, they'll be caught up in the air before they can finish. If they aren't, they'll be too busy with the Tribulation to finish.

Meanwhile, hijack a merry Christmas from the Christians, who hijacked Saturnalia from the Romans, and various other pagan solstice festivals from various other folks.

Joe Felsenstein · 24 December 2009

John Harshman said: I still say that Lee & Thicke are hoaxers.
Someone should tell poor Dr. Boli that Lee and Thicke are hoaxing him!

John Harshman · 24 December 2009

Hey, it isn't Dr. Boli's fault. He merely accepted an ad. Since the ad doesn't actually solicit money, it can't be considered fraud.

Wheels · 24 December 2009

This is why I read The Pagan's Thumb.

John Kwok · 24 December 2009

Sounds like the potential plot for Terry Gilliam's next film. Maybe we can get Premise Media to sign on as a co-producer, while the ultimate producing authority lies in the hands of Gilliam, Eric Idle or John Cleese.

SexComb · 25 December 2009

Aren't you taking this thing more seriously than it should be?

Dr. Boli's celebrated magazine is simply a joke, for instance read his bio:

"Today, at the age of 226, Dr. Boli still edits the maga­zine personally, at a time of life when other men might be con­sidering an honorable retirement. As a concession, however, to his advancing years, he no longer writes every word of the magazine himself. At present he writes every other word, the intervening words being supplied by a well-known agency."

The answer of the authors sound more like a line from South Park, than something a self-appointed scientist would say: "satanic atheistic communistic Islamofascist spawn of hell,"

It's just a joke, nothing to be taken seriously.

RBH · 25 December 2009

SexComb said: Aren't you taking this thing more seriously than it should be?
Nope, I'm taking it precisely as seriously as it warrants.
It's just a joke, nothing to be taken seriously.
Around here we take our joking rly srsly.

snaxalotl · 25 December 2009

SexComb, someone is certainly taking something too seriously. For my part, I'll be strapping on my Christmas sensibilitometer and creeping about the house making "zoop zoop" noises to check for fluctuations in the gravitas field

Migo · 25 December 2009

This reads like those UFO reports from the 60's...

Shane · 25 December 2009

Sounds like these doughty researchers are being libelled, and should take full use of England's libel laws, which seem to have been created (not evolved) specifically for this purpose. I therefore humbly suggest they enlist my lawyer.

John Kwok · 25 December 2009

Sounds like he could be a Gallifreyan Time Lord in disguise:
SexComb said: Aren't you taking this thing more seriously than it should be? Dr. Boli's celebrated magazine is simply a joke, for instance read his bio: "Today, at the age of 226, Dr. Boli still edits the maga­zine personally, at a time of life when other men might be con­sidering an honorable retirement. As a concession, however, to his advancing years, he no longer writes every word of the magazine himself. At present he writes every other word, the intervening words being supplied by a well-known agency." The answer of the authors sound more like a line from South Park, than something a self-appointed scientist would say: "satanic atheistic communistic Islamofascist spawn of hell," It's just a joke, nothing to be taken seriously.

Stanton · 25 December 2009

John Kwok said: Sounds like he could be a Gallifreyan Time Lord in disguise
Don't make me use the Omega Sanction on you and trap you in the "Life that is Death in Disco"

fnxtr · 25 December 2009

"Chaos, Gaia, and Eros arose spontaneously from nothing."

I don't know about Gaia, but I've certainly experienced both Chaos and Eros arising spontaneously from nothing. Sometimes together.

fnxtr · 25 December 2009

No! Please don't send me back to the 70's! Anything but that!

(Of course, the 70's also gave us Dark Side of the Moon and Close to the Edge...)

Stanton · 25 December 2009

fnxtr said: No! Please don't send me back to the 70's! Anything but that! (Of course, the 70's also gave us Dark Side of the Moon and Close to the Edge...)
And Disco Inferno

John Kwok · 25 December 2009

No, no, no... not the Disco Tute. Anything but the Disco Tute please. I know the Master has been paying Dembski visits, urging him onward:
Stanton said:
John Kwok said: Sounds like he could be a Gallifreyan Time Lord in disguise
Don't make me use the Omega Sanction on you and trap you in the "Life that is Death in Disco"

Matt Young · 25 December 2009

Dr. Boli is hysterical. If you entertain for 1 minute the notion that he is serious, check out his ad for Ampersand Sons. Dr. Boli has also published the following notice on his blog:

Recently Dr. Boli has heard rumors to the effect that “H. Albertus Boli” is really a pseudonym for the well-known writer Christopher Bailey. Dr. Boli refuses either to confirm or to deny these rumors, since to do so would be to lend them a dignity of which they are wholly undeserving. He would merely ask the rumormongers what makes them so certain that “Christopher Bailey” is not a pseudonym for H. Albertus Boli.

There are of course a lot of Christopher Baileys, but with a little judicious Googling I think you can figure out which one Dr. Boli masquerades as.

raven · 25 December 2009

I don’t know about Gaia, but I’ve certainly experienced both Chaos and Eros arising spontaneously from nothing. Sometimes together.
Don't worry. That is normal. We've all been there.

Butch Pansy · 25 December 2009

Stanton said:
fnxtr said: No! Please don't send me back to the 70's! Anything but that! (Of course, the 70's also gave us Dark Side of the Moon and Close to the Edge...)
And Disco Inferno
...the Talking Heads, the B52s, Roxy Music, the Nuns, the Avengers, the Dead Kennedys, the Butthole Surfers, Foetus, Cluster, Kraftwerk, the Ramones...a wide and wonderful decade!!!one11!

John Kwok · 26 December 2009

You're forgetting The Police, The Clash, Dire Straits, Elton John, Billy Joel, The Eagles, and the Boss, Bruce Springsteen:
Butch Pansy said:
Stanton said:
fnxtr said: No! Please don't send me back to the 70's! Anything but that! (Of course, the 70's also gave us Dark Side of the Moon and Close to the Edge...)
And Disco Inferno
...the Talking Heads, the B52s, Roxy Music, the Nuns, the Avengers, the Dead Kennedys, the Butthole Surfers, Foetus, Cluster, Kraftwerk, the Ramones...a wide and wonderful decade!!!one11!

Frank J · 26 December 2009

John Kwok said: You're forgetting The Police, The Clash, Dire Straits, Elton John, Billy Joel, The Eagles, and the Boss, Bruce Springsteen:
Butch Pansy said:
Stanton said:
fnxtr said: No! Please don't send me back to the 70's! Anything but that! (Of course, the 70's also gave us Dark Side of the Moon and Close to the Edge...)
And Disco Inferno
...the Talking Heads, the B52s, Roxy Music, the Nuns, the Avengers, the Dead Kennedys, the Butthole Surfers, Foetus, Cluster, Kraftwerk, the Ramones...a wide and wonderful decade!!!one11!
That sounds more like 70s and 80s. Anyway, as the no-name decade comes to an end I'm still lost in the 50s. For Chritmans I received my 3rd copy (one is an LP) of "Kind of Blue." This one has bonus tracks that I don't have on CD or at all, though.

Frank J · 26 December 2009

Chritmans? My New Year's resolution (which I'll probably break by 1/2/10) is to use spel chekcer.

Wheels · 26 December 2009

This isn't the no-name decade, it's the noughties!

John Kwok · 26 December 2009

And before I forget, David Bowie, Gloria Gaynor, Donna Summer, Hall & Oates, Emerson Lake Palmer....
Wheels said: This isn't the no-name decade, it's the noughties!
Frank J said:
John Kwok said: You're forgetting The Police, The Clash, Dire Straits, Elton John, Billy Joel, The Eagles, and the Boss, Bruce Springsteen:
Butch Pansy said:
Stanton said:
fnxtr said: No! Please don't send me back to the 70's! Anything but that! (Of course, the 70's also gave us Dark Side of the Moon and Close to the Edge...)
And Disco Inferno
...the Talking Heads, the B52s, Roxy Music, the Nuns, the Avengers, the Dead Kennedys, the Butthole Surfers, Foetus, Cluster, Kraftwerk, the Ramones...a wide and wonderful decade!!!one11!
That sounds more like 70s and 80s. Anyway, as the no-name decade comes to an end I'm still lost in the 50s. For Chritmans I received my 3rd copy (one is an LP) of "Kind of Blue." This one has bonus tracks that I don't have on CD or at all, though.

DS · 26 December 2009

The Wrong Reverend said:

“But a true scientist follows the facts wherever they lead him, as long as they do not lead him outside the pages of Genesis.”

There are simply no words to describe how utterly insane this is, so I won't waste any more.

shonny · 26 December 2009

“But a true scientist follows the facts wherever they lead him, as long as they do not lead him outside the pages of Genesis.”

Am - trying -to . . . shit, no, still ROFLMAO!

amphiox · 26 December 2009

DS said: The Wrong Reverend said: “But a true scientist follows the facts wherever they lead him, as long as they do not lead him outside the pages of Genesis.” There are simply no words to describe how utterly insane this is, so I won't waste any more.
Consistent, though, with the previous "beyond which it is not permissible to search for common ancestors." It is this level of consistency that betrays the Poe. Real creationist arguments tend to struggle to approach such a level of internal coherence.

Stanton · 26 December 2009

John Kwok said: And before I forget, David Bowie, Gloria Gaynor, Donna Summer, Hall & Oates, Emerson Lake Palmer....
*banishes John to the Life That Is Death on The Lawrence Welk Show*

RBH · 26 December 2009

Stanton said:
John Kwok said: And before I forget, David Bowie, Gloria Gaynor, Donna Summer, Hall & Oates, Emerson Lake Palmer....
*banishes John to the Life That Is Death on The Lawrence Welk Show*
Aw, man, that's the musical equivalent of Godwin's Law.

Stanton · 26 December 2009

RBH said:
Stanton said:
John Kwok said: And before I forget, David Bowie, Gloria Gaynor, Donna Summer, Hall & Oates, Emerson Lake Palmer....
*banishes John to the Life That Is Death on The Lawrence Welk Show*
Aw, man, that's the musical equivalent of Godwin's Law.
No: The Musical Godwin's Law is when you accuse your opponent of liking or even having a positive opinion of Britney Spear's "Crossroads"

John Kwok · 26 December 2009

Well I've been listening and singing along to Elton John's "Step into Christmas" lately:
Stanton said:
John Kwok said: And before I forget, David Bowie, Gloria Gaynor, Donna Summer, Hall & Oates, Emerson Lake Palmer....
*banishes John to the Life That Is Death on The Lawrence Welk Show*
Stanton said:
RBH said:
Stanton said:
John Kwok said: And before I forget, David Bowie, Gloria Gaynor, Donna Summer, Hall & Oates, Emerson Lake Palmer....
*banishes John to the Life That Is Death on The Lawrence Welk Show*
Aw, man, that's the musical equivalent of Godwin's Law.
No: The Musical Godwin's Law is when you accuse your opponent of liking or even having a positive opinion of Britney Spear's "Crossroads"

fnxtr · 26 December 2009

Wow that is one mixed bag there, John Kwok. I suppose you'd have The Village People and King Crimson together on your mix tape?

John Kwok · 26 December 2009

No, not really... but since I regard myself as a child of the 70s, I have to be mindful of "glitter rock" (e. g. David Bowie and Elton John), "New Wave" (Talking Heads, The Police, Blondie and The Clash), and of course Disco (Gloria Gaynor, Donna Summer):
fnxtr said: Wow that is one mixed bag there, John Kwok. I suppose you'd have The Village People and King Crimson together on your mix tape?

Frank J · 27 December 2009

fnxtr said: Wow that is one mixed bag there, John Kwok. I suppose you'd have The Village People and King Crimson together on your mix tape?
You'll love my mixed bag. Although most of the "kinds" (gotta work in in "baraminology" somewhere) I like predates the 70s, it includes jazz, rock, pop, even country. But I still have a fondness for some of the "Philly sound" of the 70s and the occasional song after that. My tape might include Fletcher Henderson, Charlie Parker, John Coltrane, Chuck Berry, Frank Sinatra, O'Jays, Patsy Cline, even one or 2 Beatles' songs.

John Kwok · 27 December 2009

All kidding aside, I am more a serious fan of classical music than of anything else, though I would have to rank as among my non-classical favorites, jazz (especially big band swing jazz from several local New York City bands, including ones headed by a friend and high school classmate, George Gee), Elton John, Billy Joel, Mary Chapin Carpenter (Am biased since she's a fellow alumnus of our undergraduate alma mater), Fleetwood Mac, Sting, Squeeze, Elvis Costello, Talking Heads, The Police, Coldplay, Sara Bareilles, John Mayer and even Katy Perry:
Frank J said:
fnxtr said: Wow that is one mixed bag there, John Kwok. I suppose you'd have The Village People and King Crimson together on your mix tape?
You'll love my mixed bag. Although most of the "kinds" (gotta work in in "baraminology" somewhere) I like predates the 70s, it includes jazz, rock, pop, even country. But I still have a fondness for some of the "Philly sound" of the 70s and the occasional song after that. My tape might include Fletcher Henderson, Charlie Parker, John Coltrane, Chuck Berry, Frank Sinatra, O'Jays, Patsy Cline, even one or 2 Beatles' songs.

Frank J · 27 December 2009

Looks like John's taste is a bit more eclectic than mine, but since Lawrence Welk was mentioned, the song "Calcutta" always takes me back to the first time I heard it - on a plane in 1961.

For whatever reason, my ears just prefer songs recorded over 40-50 years ago. New recordings of old songs tend to hurt my ears me even more than new songs.

I'm also fascinated by the "evolution" of 20th century popular (non-classical) music, whether or not I even like the particular styles. For example I don't have that "inordinate fondness for Beatles" but I'm fascinated with how rapidly their music "evolved" in just a few years.

Wheels · 27 December 2009

I recently got into a bad and, through the magic of buying most of their albums, watched them evolve from early 80s thrash metal to breakthrough success and acclaim as the Trans-Siberian Orchestra.

Frank J · 27 December 2009

Wheels said: I recently got into a bad and, through the magic of buying most of their albums, watched them evolve from early 80s thrash metal to breakthrough success and acclaim as the Trans-Siberian Orchestra.
Hmm, maybe John is not the king of eclectic after all. Thanks to the magic of Christmas, I like some songs by TSO. And Band Aid, Bruce Springteen, The Ronettes, Perry Como, Andy Williams, Burl Ives, Bing Crosby. From "Charlie Brown" (Vince Guaraldi Trio) to Charles Brown ("Merry Christmas Baby," "Please Come Home for Christmas") I can listen to them year-round.

fnxtr · 27 December 2009

Heh. I just started getting into big band, even wrote one that the local guys/gals are going to play in the new year. Otherwise I really don't go back much further than The Yardbirds. Well, until you go back to Stravinsky, that is. :-) Oh, and one of the highlights of winter for me, too, is "nutcracker".

Frank J, have you heard the remake of "Constantinople" by They Might Be Giants?

Shebardigan · 27 December 2009

Late to the party as always, /me recently discovered that he could re-create his lost classic Roy Acuff album from 1950 by buying the tunes piecemeal from Amazon at USD0.99 per. Certainly beats finding the vinyl on the web somewhere at a classic auction price.

Speaking of kinds and evolution, Roddy Frame's recent stuff is as appealing as the Aztec Camera corpus from the earlier geologic stratum discussed above.

John Kwok · 27 December 2009

Well if you like big band jazz more than a bit, be sure to check out George Gee's stuff over at his website, http://www.georgegee.com:
fnxtr said: Heh. I just started getting into big band, even wrote one that the local guys/gals are going to play in the new year. Otherwise I really don't go back much further than The Yardbirds. Well, until you go back to Stravinsky, that is. :-) Oh, and one of the highlights of winter for me, too, is "nutcracker". Frank J, have you heard the remake of "Constantinople" by They Might Be Giants?

John Kwok · 27 December 2009

Hsve a sore spot in my heart for Ronnie Spector's and Darlene Love's Phil Spector-produced Christmas Carols (IMHO "All I Want for Christmas" sounds really first rate from Darlene Love, not from Mariah Carey.). Ditto for Dan Fogelberg's tale of Auld Lang Syne:
Frank J said:
Wheels said: I recently got into a bad and, through the magic of buying most of their albums, watched them evolve from early 80s thrash metal to breakthrough success and acclaim as the Trans-Siberian Orchestra.
Hmm, maybe John is not the king of eclectic after all. Thanks to the magic of Christmas, I like some songs by TSO. And Band Aid, Bruce Springteen, The Ronettes, Perry Como, Andy Williams, Burl Ives, Bing Crosby. From "Charlie Brown" (Vince Guaraldi Trio) to Charles Brown ("Merry Christmas Baby," "Please Come Home for Christmas") I can listen to them year-round.

Doctor Biobrain · 28 December 2009

Congratulations, Comrade Panda. It is hereby understood that you have been declared a winner in the First Centennial Carnival of the Liberals: Century of the Nihilist Edition Carnival.

Your honor has been duly noted in the records and we thank you for choosing to donate your prize money to the Obama for Life Re-Election Committee. Your contribution of one million dollars will go far towards tilting the Supreme Court in the proper direction. Obama appreciates your affection and wants you to know that he loves you and is very, very proud of you.

All Hail Obama! Obama for Life!

Dave Luckett · 28 December 2009

And a merry Christmas to you, too, oh defender of the faith.

Frank J · 28 December 2009

Frank J, have you heard the remake of “Constantinople” by They Might Be Giants?

— fnxtr
No, but in googling I see that it is the same as "Istanbul (not Constantinople)." The melody has been familiar for decades but only a few years ago did I hear the Four Lads’ version.

Ditto for Dan Fogelberg’s tale of Auld Lang Syne:

— John Kwok
Same here. Sadly, Fogelberg, and Michael Brecker, who plays the soprano sax solo at the end, both passed on in 2007.

John Kwok · 28 December 2009

Yes, I knew about Fogelberg - what a great loss for popular music IMHO - but I didn't know about Brecker (another great loss IMHO):
Frank J said:

Frank J, have you heard the remake of “Constantinople” by They Might Be Giants?

— fnxtr
No, but in googling I see that it is the same as "Istanbul (not Constantinople)." The melody has been familiar for decades but only a few years ago did I hear the Four Lads’ version.

Ditto for Dan Fogelberg’s tale of Auld Lang Syne:

— John Kwok
Same here. Sadly, Fogelberg, and Michael Brecker, who plays the soprano sax solo at the end, both passed on in 2007.

Dan · 28 December 2009

Doctor Biobrain said: Congratulations, Comrade Panda. It is hereby understood that you have been declared a winner in the First Centennial Carnival of the Liberals: Century of the Nihilist Edition Carnival.
One of the strangest things about the evolution vs. creation "debate" is that some see it as a matter of liberal ideology (evolution) vs. conservative ideology (creationism), whereas it's actually a matter of evidence (evolution) vs. ideology (creationism).

DS · 28 December 2009

Dan said:
Doctor Biobrain said: Congratulations, Comrade Panda. It is hereby understood that you have been declared a winner in the First Centennial Carnival of the Liberals: Century of the Nihilist Edition Carnival.
One of the strangest things about the evolution vs. creation "debate" is that some see it as a matter of liberal ideology (evolution) vs. conservative ideology (creationism), whereas it's actually a matter of evidence (evolution) vs. ideology (creationism).
Agreed. A culture war is one thing, but a war against reality, there is no good way for that to end.

John Kwok · 28 December 2009

Absolutely. What many evolution denialists (and some who accept it too BTW) forget that there are many conservatives who recognize that evolution is a well-established scientific fact and scientific theory, while creationism is not only ideology, but really both pseudoscientific religiously-derived nonsense and mendacious intellectual pornography:
Dan said:
Doctor Biobrain said: Congratulations, Comrade Panda. It is hereby understood that you have been declared a winner in the First Centennial Carnival of the Liberals: Century of the Nihilist Edition Carnival.
One of the strangest things about the evolution vs. creation "debate" is that some see it as a matter of liberal ideology (evolution) vs. conservative ideology (creationism), whereas it's actually a matter of evidence (evolution) vs. ideology (creationism).

Stan Polanski · 28 December 2009

(With apologies for taking this thread further off-topic and deeper into musical meanderings.) Frank J, your playlist chimes pretty well with some parts of my musical world. I can't resist tossing in a few things I've been listening to: the Kruger Brothers' "The Suite - Vol 1," Elis Regina and Antonio Carlos Jobim's, "Elis and Tom," and Lockjaw Davis' big band record, "Trane Whistle." I suspect any of these will make your day.

RBH · 28 December 2009

What ever happened to Spike Jones? :)

Frank J · 28 December 2009

One of the strangest things about the evolution vs. creation “debate” is that some see it as a matter of liberal ideology (evolution) vs. conservative ideology (creationism), whereas it’s actually a matter of evidence (evolution) vs. ideology (creationism).

— Dan
If anything, those who demand that creationism (or ID or "strengths and weaknesses") be taught in science class at taxpayers' expense have a rather "liberal" ideology. I'm not the only one who sees it that way. Rick Santorum wrote an editorial years ago whining about "evolution only" education, and calling it "illiberal" in the editorial's title. Teaching only that science that has earned the right to be taught was not "liberal" enough for "conservative" (actually authoritarian) senator. A real conservative would say to let students learn anti-evolution pseudoscience on their own time, and on their parents' dime.

Stanton · 28 December 2009

RBH said: What ever happened to Spike Jones? :)
Jack Benny said: "Here, Ed, let me help you up." Ed the Guard said: "Wait a moment, I'm counting the dead gophers... I've been meaning to ask you, Mr Benny; who installed your alarm?" Jack said "Spike Jones"

John Kwok · 28 December 2009

Agreed. As a self-proclaimed conservative with very, very strong libertarian tendencies, I regard as gross hypocrisy anything stated by the likes of Santorum, Jindal, and others who wish to see something else taught alongside evolution in science classrooms. Unfortunately they tend to be so intellectually-challenged that they themselves can't see this hypocrisy:
Frank J said:

One of the strangest things about the evolution vs. creation “debate” is that some see it as a matter of liberal ideology (evolution) vs. conservative ideology (creationism), whereas it’s actually a matter of evidence (evolution) vs. ideology (creationism).

— Dan
If anything, those who demand that creationism (or ID or "strengths and weaknesses") be taught in science class at taxpayers' expense have a rather "liberal" ideology. I'm not the only one who sees it that way. Rick Santorum wrote an editorial years ago whining about "evolution only" education, and calling it "illiberal" in the editorial's title. Teaching only that science that has earned the right to be taught was not "liberal" enough for "conservative" (actually authoritarian) senator. A real conservative would say to let students learn anti-evolution pseudoscience on their own time, and on their parents' dime.

Mike Elzinga · 28 December 2009

RBH said: What ever happened to Spike Jones? :)
“As the sun pulls away from the shore and our boat sinks slowly in the west, we approach the island of Lulu - spelled backwards, Ulul. Ah, in the distance we hear Spike Jones and his Wacky Wacketeers!”

RBH · 28 December 2009

Mike Elzinga said: “As the sun pulls away from the shore and our boat sinks slowly in the west, we approach the island of Lulu - spelled backwards, Ulul. Ah, in the distance we hear Spike Jones and his Wacky Wacketeers!”
Audio only. I actually remember hearing that in the late 1940s. Scary how long ago that was.

Mike Elzinga · 28 December 2009

RBH said:
Mike Elzinga said: “As the sun pulls away from the shore and our boat sinks slowly in the west, we approach the island of Lulu - spelled backwards, Ulul. Ah, in the distance we hear Spike Jones and his Wacky Wacketeers!”
Audio only. I actually remember hearing that in the late 1940s. Scary how long ago that was.
:-) Yup; we had that very record, and I used to play it over and over again. Burned it into my brain in the 1940s. I think we still have the recording somewhere in our family.

fnxtr · 28 December 2009

The Vancouver suburb of Richmond is built on Lulu Island. True fact.

fnxtr · 28 December 2009

... and yes, I meant "Istanbul". Sorry.

Stanton · 28 December 2009

fnxtr said: ... and yes, I meant "Istanbul". Sorry.
That's nobody's business but the Turks'.

Frank J · 28 December 2009

That’s nobody’s business but the Turks’.

— Stanton
After all, it's their party and they'll change their name if they want to.

fnxtr · 3 January 2010

Thanks for the George Gee link, John.