Photo Contest Vote: Minerals

Posted 16 August 2009 by

Below are all our finalists in the "Minerals" section of our Photo Contest. Please look through them one last time before voting for your favorite. We know it is possible to game these polls. Please act like adults and don't vote more than once. If we believe that the results are invalid, the contest will be canceled. The photos and poll are below the fold.

40 Comments

HP · 16 August 2009

Re. the largest Irish stalactite in the world: I can't help but notice that the largest Irish stalactite in the world is in Ireland. Is there some other source for Irish stalactites that I am not familiar with?

GvlGeologist, FCD · 16 August 2009

If none of the entries gains a majority, will there be a runoff?

stevaroni · 16 August 2009

Is there some other source for Irish stalactites that I am not familiar with?

'Lucky Charms' boxes?

Matt Young · 16 August 2009

... will there be a runoff?
Nope.

KP · 17 August 2009

Well, the current leader is my favorite, but I voted for a different one because I'm currently reading up on the topic to broaden my horizons...

Is that vague enough language to not invalidate the contest?

fnxtr · 17 August 2009

KP said: Well, the current leader is my favorite, but I voted for a different one because I'm currently reading up on the topic to broaden my horizons... Is that vague enough language to not invalidate the contest?
Maybe.

j · 17 August 2009

Anybody notice the fault in the Painted Hills photo?

IAMB · 17 August 2009

j said: Anybody notice the fault in the Painted Hills photo?
Glad it's not just me.

GvlGeologist, FCD · 17 August 2009

IAMB said:
j said: Anybody notice the fault in the Painted Hills photo?
Glad it's not just me.
Check the original post for that photo. You'll see several comments about it.

sharky · 18 August 2009

How'm I supposed to pick one?!

"Fulgurite?" The picture itself is not as glossy and polished as the rest, but I like the balance of the composition. And it evokes that moment where you look down and see something awesome you nearly stepped on.

Thysse's picture is wonderfully balanced, crisp, stunning, I love the colors... "Stalactite" is very mysterious and striking. "Stromatalites" I only don't love for the colors, but it looks like the photographer picked an especially interesting segment and captured a rhythmic pattern. The shot of the galaxy core is just awesome.

*clicks through them again in undecided fashion*

notedscholar · 19 August 2009

This comment has been moved to The Bathroom Wall.

Adam Cuerden · 19 August 2009

But why the cente of the galaxy in the minerals section?

Brock · 19 August 2009

Wow, the one in the lead is what I expected to be in last place. Don't get me wrong, it's still very pretty.

fnxtr · 19 August 2009

Adam Cuerden said: But why the cente of the galaxy in the minerals section?
That, also, has been discussed. Mineral is the set theoretic complement of animal and vegetable. :-)

phantomreader42 · 19 August 2009

Voted for Huaxiagnathus orientalis, even though I think that one fits better in the "animal" category. Galactic center is a close second.

JefFlyingV · 19 August 2009

I'm very partial to the Painted Hills of Oregon.

Richard Healy · 19 August 2009

I voted for the Fulgurite because I like how the photograph captures in a visual way the image of the intersection weather phenomena with a geologic record. The trace lines of the electricity etched into the granite pebble were for this reason amazing to see.

To summon up in one still image so much interesting relationships of nature, for me elevated this picture above all the rest.

Nic Nicholson · 19 August 2009

j said: Anybody notice the fault in the Painted Hills photo?
Wow! Thanks for pointing that out! The earth moved a lot in 6,000 years. ;)

Murci3lag0 · 19 August 2009

fnxtr said:
Adam Cuerden said: But why the cente of the galaxy in the minerals section?
That, also, has been discussed. Mineral is the set theoretic complement of animal and vegetable. :-)
so, there are no animals or plants in the center of the galaxy?

Henry J · 19 August 2009

so, there are no animals or plants in the center of the galaxy?

Given the amount of radiation that astrophysicists think is present in that area, probably not. :)

stevaroni · 19 August 2009

so, there are no animals or plants in the center of the galaxy?

Somehow, I expect the living things we'll find other planets will probably be classed as "other"

Monado · 19 August 2009

They are all beautiful.

I thought that "largest Irish stalactite in the world" was a pretty funny way of saying "largest stalactite in Ireland." But it was impressive and beautifully lighted to bring out its texture.

The fulgurite was interesting--I've never found one although I have seen the shatter cones in the rock around Sudbury from the meteorite that planted the nickel mines 1.8 billion years ago.

The center of the galaxy, if you turn it upside down, looks a bit like the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

The stromatolites are neat--I didn't know you could find them in Ontario and they look just like what I was swimming through on Monday.

And I love the complex landscape with tis drifts, scallops, and coloured soils.

But the therapod--the therapod is iconic and looks almost like a Babylonian mosaic or an emblem of burnished gold. Well done!

Grendels Dad · 19 August 2009

I had a hard time picking between two choices, and find them tied for third place. If only they hadn’t split the vote…

Henry J · 19 August 2009

The center of the galaxy, if you turn it upside down, looks a bit like the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

Remember though, there is no up and down in space! Therefore FSM did it!!111!eleven!! Henry

Henry J · 19 August 2009

Somehow, I expect the living things we’ll find other planets will probably be classed as “other”

Well, they almost certainly wouldn't go anywhere in the phylogeny's of our planet's species. It would be interesting to know which of our planet's species strategies are commonplace among inhabited planets, and which are in the minority. Like mobile land dwellers with four legs - is that a strategy that most biospheres would be apt to converge on? Or not? Henry

Paul Burnett · 20 August 2009

Henry J said: Like mobile land dwellers with four legs - is that a strategy that most biospheres would be apt to converge on?
It depends on Whose image they were created in.

GvlGeologist, FCD · 20 August 2009

There sure have been some interesting swings in voting lately. What's going on?

Reed A. Cartwright · 20 August 2009

PZ linked to the post, and his readers appear to like stromatolites a lot.

catbasket · 20 August 2009

This PZ reader prefers Huaxiagnathus orientalis.

Lord Zero · 20 August 2009

Stromatolites rules!
I mean, we are looking at our origins there.

Actual history which you can touch with your own hands.

A lousy stalactite is not gonna beat that.

Henry J · 20 August 2009

Paul Burnett, posted 8/20/09 9:10 AM Henry J said: Like mobile land dwellers with four legs - is that a strategy that most biospheres would be apt to converge on?

It depends on Whose image they were created in. Of course, most of the legged species on this planet have six legs, so in whose image are they? :D Henry

Stanton · 20 August 2009

Henry J said:

Paul Burnett, posted 8/20/09 9:10 AM Henry J said: Like mobile land dwellers with four legs - is that a strategy that most biospheres would be apt to converge on?

It depends on Whose image they were created in. Of course, most of the legged species on this planet have six legs, so in whose image are they? :D Henry
Just because He has an inordinate fondness for a particular order of insects doesn't necessarily mean that He looks like them anymore than a teacup poodle breeder is obligated to have a poodle haircut.

Frank J · 21 August 2009

Just because He has an inordinate fondness for a particular order of insects doesn’t necessarily mean that He looks like them anymore than a teacup poodle breeder is obligated to have a poodle haircut.

— Stanton
Exactly. And there's no reason any species on Earth has to have a noodly appendage. ;-)

deadman_932 · 21 August 2009

Gah.

In the end, I chose the Painted Hills pic -- but I'd really like nice copies of ALL of the photos, and I hope prints will be available sometime or another.

notedscholar · 21 August 2009

Question: What on Earth is the "bathroom wall"? Am I doing something wrong? Have you changed the software interface?

I would like to know so I can post like normal.

NS

Drosselmeyer · 21 August 2009

HP said: Re. the largest Irish stalactite in the world: I can't help but notice that the largest Irish stalactite in the world is in Ireland. Is there some other source for Irish stalactites that I am not familiar with?
Northern Ireland. Part of the UK. Everything in it is Irish, but it's not 'Republic of Ireland.'

DS · 21 August 2009

NS,

The bathroom wall is the place where off topic, rude or nonsensical posts are banished in order to avoid the spectre of censorship. If you don't want your comments to go there, then try to avoid the afore mentioned transgressions. You can click on the "WALL" link at the top of the main page to get there.

melior · 21 August 2009

Come on, don't sell yourself short... It's the largest Irish stalactite in the universe!

Dave · 24 August 2009

I voted for the fossil that's not currently in the lead. But then, any theropod scores bonus points in my estimation! :-)

Quentin · 24 August 2009

The 'largest Irish stalactite in the world' was an Irish Bull I heard at the time that stuck with me. As I said on the original thread, it's thought to be the largest (longest and most massive) free hanging stalactite in the Northern Hemisphere.

Monado, Thanks for the comment about lighting. it took some time to set up the photo which required my friend and me to climb high up on the cave wall to get the angles right. Most photos of it are from underneath looking up, which foreshorten the image.

My second choice was the Stromatolites too. Painted hills was pretty, but I've seen better photos from the same viewpoint