Don McLeroy is the deranged creationist dentist who was appointed to the chairmanship of the Texas State Board of Education, and who is responsible for the recent purge and intimidation of people who support good biology — he's trouble all the way through. Take a look at his latest stunt.
The State Board of Education's debate on new English and reading standards took another rowdy turn Friday as members approved a never-before-seen version of the lengthy document which materialized less than an hour before the board was to take a final vote.
After a wacky and terse debate on the new curriculum, the board voted 9-6 in favor of the new version, which will remain in place for the next decade and sets standards for state tests and textbooks, as well as classroom teaching.
Experts and teachers have been working on the new curriculum standards for two and a half years.
"I find it's really wild that we can work for three years on a project and then the board is so qualified they can pull it out of their hat overnight," said board member Pat Hardy, a Fort Worth Republican who, like other board members, received the substituted document when it was slipped under her hotel door less than an hour before their meeting was set to convene Friday morning.
Some social conservatives on the board prepared the latest version overnight.
This is similar to what our former education commissioner for Minnesota, Cheri Yecke, tried to pull — she tried to swap in a 'minority report' for the state science standards that was composed behind the back of the official committee … only McLeroy has outdone her by an order of magnitude or so. Why even bring in qualified educators and scientists to do the hard work of a standards committee if you're just going to throw their work away and replace it with some hack job done by ideologues overnight? And to give it to them for review an hour before the meeting is just plain insulting.
This is for the English standards. What kind of circus are we going to see in response to the upcoming science standards?
At least one board of education member is calling for McLeroy's ejection, although it sounds like she doesn't expect anything to come of it. This is what we can expect of creationist conservatives: a dictatorship of the incompetent.
46 Comments
freelunch · 24 May 2008
What about the others who voted for something they hadn't even read? The certainly don't get a pass for being so indifferent to the quality of education standards.
Martin · 24 May 2008
The comment by "mjones" is from a notorious and prolific troll named Dennis Markuze, who most commonly posts as "drmabus" or "David Mabus." He's a completely bipolar psychotic, whose major bug-up-the-ass obsession is that he thinks he's proved that Nostradamus prophecies are correct and that James Randi shut down the Million Dollar Challenge just to avoid paying him. He's quite mad and I recommend deleting all of his comments and banning his IP, if possible. He's simply after attention and he only gets more abusive and hysterical the more he goes on.
tiredofthesos · 24 May 2008
First, why isn't this obvious, ill-mannered, and purposefully off-topic troll mjones allowed to post here?
Can he be automatically sent to BW?
As for the topic itself: the SOP of Xians and their political allies is exactly the same as that of power-seeking bullies everywhere - I'll hint at two famous historical examples of these same tactics w/o naming the "parties" involved.
The evolutionary value of this sort of thing is undeniable, but still morally repugnant to homo sapiens who have other selling points for potential mates.
KL · 24 May 2008
mplavcan · 24 May 2008
Looks like a preview of the Texas State Board of Education's model future product has decided to post here.
Martin · 24 May 2008
Sure enough, shortly after I explained who Markuze was (just prior to his first comment getting deleted), he came back over to my blog (where he's been before) and tried posting his ravings there. He's too stupid to understand the concept of comment moderation, though, which makes his visits an exercise in desperation and futility. Looks as if moderation would be really useful here on PT.
tiredofthesos · 24 May 2008
Shebardigan · 25 May 2008
Not that I would try to inject something vaguely related to the topic, or such, but...
The "number of days not embarrassed to be a Texas Resident : number of days REALLY embarrassed to be a Texas Resident" ratio has exhibited a steady and reliable decline.
Frank J · 25 May 2008
The one thing to remember about McLeroy is that he is not the usual clueless Biblical literalist on school boards who haven't gotten the DI's "memo." Rather, he is 100% in on the scam, though not very good at keeping his mouth shut about it. Note how he admits that one should not argue over the "side issues." Never mind that they are the only issues that could conceivably make one of the mutually contradictory creationist positions qualify as science. Nope, let's not dare critically analyze alternate proposed ages of life or the possibility that "kinds" originated independently. Only the "Darwinism" strawman.
Duvenoy · 25 May 2008
Jesus neither spoke nor wrote English, therefore no one should. He also didn't know an armadillo from a tuatara, therefore neither exists. I vote we give Texas back to Mexico, by force if necessary.
"David Mabus" attempted to enlighten we denizens of Skeptic Friends to Randi's perfidy and got verbally & hilariously, and yet politely, roughed up for it. He vanished. Then he returned for an Amazin' Redux, to our unbridled joy (we rather like our trolls at SFN and only rarely ban them), and got worked over again by some very studious and articulate people. I for one, hope for a third try; that one's the charm, the Gambler's Fallacy not withstanding.
doov
Ron Okimoto · 25 May 2008
So when are we going to see a copy of this document that they wrote up in one night and got a majority of the board to sign off on? Can it be modified after the vote? Three years of study on the subject ignored. It is worse than the Kansas fiasco. Not only that, but it is English and reading standards. If you can't trust the board to be honest and have integrity about a subject like that what will happen in subjects that they really don't like.
How many of the board members read the document carefully enough to be able to vote on it? It sounds bad, and probably is worse than it sounds. To have that much of a majority of the board as incompetent yes men is pretty pathetic. How much would a delay have cost them to make the ploy look less bogus?
raven · 25 May 2008
Just the Texas Taliban theocrats in action. Routine.
We already know the biology standards will be replaced at the last minute with some dreck from (no)AnswersinGenesis or some such. It would not be too early to start preparing the court cases.
McLeroy et al. are typical fanatics. They know what they are doing and could care less what anyone thinks. And the difference between the Texas crowd and the Afghani Taliban or the Ayatollohs of Iraq, Sudan, or Saudi Arabia is,....not much.
They haven't beheaded anyone in Texas. Yet. The first one will be either a biology teacher or a lawyer from the ACLU.
raven · 25 May 2008
mplavcan · 25 May 2008
Look on the bright side. This smells more like Dover than anything else. The fact that McLeroy is so outspoken and unapologetic will make the inevitable lawsuit a slam-dunk.
LeeH · 25 May 2008
Ron Okimoto · 25 May 2008
raven · 25 May 2008
Stacy S. · 25 May 2008
Top 10 reasons to give Texas Back.
Torbjörn Larsson, OM · 25 May 2008
Torbjörn Larsson, OM · 25 May 2008
JJ · 25 May 2008
None of us in Texas actually think the document was written the night before. Those nine had seen the document well in advance. Hopefully there is something that can be done legally. The open meeting law won't work, as two of the board members claimed they produced the document. It takes three board members or more being together before they must follow open meeting rules.
Stacy - give Texas back !!! There are a few of us who are still sane in Texas:)
Fortunately, on that list, Barney Maddox is not a board member, he ran for the board but was defeated.
JJ · 25 May 2008
Raven - I still need to get you the names and circumstances of the other two state science supervisors fired because they stood up for evolution. Texas is not the only state in which this has occurred.
Stacy S. · 25 May 2008
raven · 25 May 2008
keith · 25 May 2008
The weeny evos are pouting...LOL!
This guy is presented as a dentist, how terrible and he's also a Texas A&M Electrical Engineer grad. Oh No not another one of those people whose math extends beyond college algebra and has a spectrum of physics, mechanics, chemistry, and thermodynamics from other than the biology comic book versions.
And appointed by the governor as a complete incompetent and deranged dentist to the board....darn those politicians.
I understand he spent two hours studying biology and then passed the advanced standing test for a PhD. in Biology from S.W. Louisiana Tech (you know Barby's Alma Mater).
Rilke's Granddaughter · 25 May 2008
harold · 25 May 2008
Science Avenger · 25 May 2008
JJ · 25 May 2008
Thanks Raven - I will get the info to Blake. One person "retired" after being fired, the other moved to a different position in their state dept. of education.
Must be a slow night in Oklahoma, our troll Keith is back, presenting his opinion and hoping others will accept that as fact. That's okay, everyone needs a good laugh on a holiday weekend. Forest's Alma mater is Tulane. Start the clock, let's see how long it takes for those anger management issues to surface tonight.
Wheels · 25 May 2008
raven · 25 May 2008
Shirakawasuna · 26 May 2008
Keith = Keith Eaton = Pathologically Insane?
Anywho... you would think that a half-intelligent person would've tried to make it at least *seem* like they weren't completely dishonest hacks. How hard is it, really, to tow an ignorant line for two weeks and *then* ignore the three years of work put into the standards? I think Texans have a right to demand competent liars and charlatans as heads and members of the standards board.
Why is this kind of thing even feasible?
elemenopea · 26 May 2008
Dan · 26 May 2008
JaWiHe · 26 May 2008
It seems to me these bozos are trying to provoke a court case now instead of later. I think they did the same thing with declining to accept a math textbook for no good reason. And I believe they won that one. In Texas the fix could be in. The goal is to go to court over English standards no one cares about. If they win then they have precedence for their authority to act without justification and for any reason. I don't know that we can trust judges in these parts to do the right thing. Plus, by voting these clowns in (Perry), it's like we've asked for it. My wife's an English teacher here in Texas, and many are hopping mad. I just don't know of anything that can be done. I assure you our letters just reinforce these people's confidence that they're right. They absolutely know they're being deceptive.
Scott Beach · 26 May 2008
Don McLeroy and his compatriots rammed the revised English and reading standards through the Texas State Board of Education for the purpose of conditioning us to expect and accept such behavior. Having been thus conditioned, fewer people will take notice the next time it happens. When they ram revised (pseudo)science standards through the Board, they will be able to assert that they followed "standard procedures" in the adoption of those standards, and most people will accept their "standard procedures" explanation.
Mr. McLeroy is obviously a student of B. F. Skinner's behavioral conditioning techniques.
Science Avenger · 26 May 2008
Wheels · 26 May 2008
harold · 26 May 2008
Science Avenger -
I seem to have created some confusion. I certainly didn't mean to deny that every university math department offers courses with the word "algebra" in the name, like Linear Algebra and so on. All of the stuff you refer to is offered at every college and university I've ever heard of.
I was just assuming that when used in isolation, the word "algebra" usually refers to high school level algebra.
This exchange does lead me to wonder if Keith Eaton is aware of the broader meaning of the word "algebra", though, and if he isn't, if that might not constitute further evidence that he lies when claiming to be an "engineer".
Mariqu · 27 May 2008
I served on Texas science re-write committee in Feb. We tried to get every committee to change the wording so that the phase about strengths and weaknesses of theories would be eliminated. The Biology committee was so large they couldn't manage to agree on very much at all and as far as I know did not finish the re-write job. Almost all the sciences managed to eliminate that line. I can definitely believe that the SBOE will vote to do what they d--m well please to do. As long as "I don't care what the people want Perry" is still in office I don't think we are going to get anywhere. We need to get Mr. Good Hair out of office and then maybe we can get a little sense back in the process. Texas is first on every list where it should be 50th and 50th on every list where is should be first and damn proud of it. signed. Not a Native
JJ · 27 May 2008
Mariqu
I was the one who got the groups to eliminate the "strengths and weaknesses" phrase when the Texas revision teams met. It is out now in all high school and middle school courses. I am also part of the biology revision group. Please explain what you mean by the biology group was large and couldn't agree on much of anything. There were only five of us in that group. We didn't have any disagreements. "As far as you know"...that must not be too far, our revisions for the first draft were completed and turned in. One of the problems the ELAR group had was squabbles within the revision teams. We need to have a united front in science. All interested stakeholders need to start making the public aware of the SBOE tactics. Most people in our state probably don't have a clue as to what happened in Austin last week. The public needs to know science education will be weaken by the SBOE actions.
Mariqu · 27 May 2008
Maybe you and I are not talking about the same thing. I was on the TEKS revision group but not for biology and there were 7 - 9 people in biology as compared to Aquatic Science and Environmental which had only 3. At the point when the new TEKS were handed in Saturday afternoon the biology committee was not finished and either chemistry or physics had not removed that phrase from the TEKS. From what I saw in the TEKS biology handed in there were very few changes. I think they did get that phrase out of biology but I know at that time it was not out of all the TEKS.
CJColucci · 27 May 2008
It seems to me these bozos are trying to provoke a court case now instead of later. I think they did the same thing with declining to accept a math textbook for no good reason. And I believe they won that one. In Texas the fix could be in. The goal is to go to court over English standards no one cares about. If they win then they have precedence for their authority to act without justification and for any reason. I don’t know that we can trust judges in these parts to do the right thing.
You may be right about what they're trying, but it won't work. A suit challenging the English standards on the grounds that they are stupid and arbitrary would probably have to be brought in Texas state court and might well go the way these bozos want. There is no law that prevents, say, mandating the teaching of non-Stratfordian theories concerning Shakespeare or phlogiston chemistry just because it's damn stupid. When the cdesignpropentists biology standards pass, however, it will be a different story. In that case, the plaintiffs can go into federal court (a far better bet than the Texas state courts) and claim that it isn't just damn stupid, but a smuggling of religion into the classroom. The board may have the right to mandate stupidity, but it doesn't have the right to mandate religion. In theory -- but only in theory -- it is possible that the board could prove it was merely stupid, not religious, but I wouldn't worry about it.
Wheels · 27 May 2008
Huh, comment finally showed up.
Or maybe it was just my cache needing to be cleared?
william e emba · 28 May 2008
Mullet · 12 February 2010
here is a song I wrote about texas to sum up what is doing to history and science: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9sZJghx_lE