Expelled Exposed: The Untold Sequel - Nancey Murphy

Posted 30 March 2008 by

Do you think Expelled will discuss the story of Nancey Murphy as told at the Washington Post? Let's look in more detail at Expelled Exposed

Nancey Murphy, a religious scholar at Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena, Calif., said she faced a campaign to get her fired because she expressed the view that intelligent design was not only poor theology, but "so stupid, I don't want to give them my time." Murphy, who believes in evolution, said she had to fight to keep her job after one of the founding members of the intelligent design movement, legal theorist Phillip Johnson, called a trustee at the seminary and tried to get her fired. "His tactic has always been to fight dirty when anyone attacks his ideas," she said. "For a long time afterward, I would tell reporters I don't want to comment, and I don't want you to say I don't want to comment. I'm tired of being careful." Johnson denied he had tried to get Murphy fired. He said that he had spoken with a former trustee of the seminary who was himself upset with Murphy but that he was not responsible for any action taken against her. "It's the Darwinists who hold the power in academia and who threaten the professional status and livelihoods of anyone who disagrees," Johnson said. "They feel to teach anything but their orthodoxy is an act of professional treason."

What could have been Murphy's 'crime'? She published a scathing review of Johnson's "Darwin on Trial" titled Phillip Johnson on Trial: A Critique of His Critique of Darwin in Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith, 1993, vol 45, no 1 pp 26-36.

Phillip Johnson's recent book, Darwin on Trial, claims to show that the reasoning presented in favor of evolutionary biology is defective. Such a book, being one of so many, would excite little attention were it not for the fact that the author is an expert in legal reasoning, and has contributed his particular skills to the debate. However, the canons of scientific argument are quite different from those of the courtroom, and it can be shown that Johnson's critique of Darwinian thought falls far short of the mark in that it does not fully appreciate the special requirements of scientific argumentation.

— Nancey Murphy
The Washington Post also describes the story of Caroline Crocker

GMU spokesman Daniel Walsch denied that the school had fired Crocker. She was a part-time faculty member, he said, and was let go at the end of her contract period for reasons unrelated to her views on intelligent design. "We wholeheartedly support academic freedom," he said. But teachers also have a responsibility to stick to subjects they were hired to teach, he added, and intelligent design belonged in a religion class, not biology. Does academic freedom "literally give you the right to talk about anything, whether it has anything to do with the subject matter or not? The answer is no."

Screenshots of Coral Ridge video Caroline Crocker's powerpoint slides were recently made available and paint a picture of poor scientific arguments. Other examples of her claims can be seen at Coral Ridge which was strongl criticized by PZ Myers Caroline Crocker is presently employed as the "Executive Director of the Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness (IDEA) Center, as well as being self-employed in the Washington DC area as an author, speaker, and private tutor." Read more about Caroline Crocker.

64 Comments

tacitus · 30 March 2008

One minor correction -- Crocker's slides weren't made avaiable per se, the images over at TinyFrog are stills from the "Coral Ridge Hour" show you mention. So, ironically, she must have supplied them to the show as examples of how innocuous her materials were and how good a teacher she was.

Obviously she flunked on both counts.

Torbjörn Larsson, OM · 30 March 2008

The main links in the post uses nonstandard linking (they don't lead to the full post but the Expelled Expose website), which is a time waster.

Otherwise, this was timely info. Keep at'em!

John Kwok · 30 March 2008

PZ, 'tis an excellent post. I've quoted it in brief reminders elsewhere, especially over at Amazon.com, merely to demonstrate yet another example of the Disco Tute's Fascist behavior.

raven · 30 March 2008

Crocker is astonishingly incompetent.

Her slide Presumed Transitional Fossils are just creo lies strung together.

My comments in bold.

Birds in same layer.

This is a lie. What are in the same layer are Pterodactyls and dinosaurs.

Is a bird, not a reptobird.

Another lie. Archaeaopteryx has a toothed jaw, no beak, claws on its wings, and a long dinosaurian tail and skeleton.

only one complete fossil

Lie. There are 10 fossils collected over a 150 year period.

Questioned as a fraud.

Hoyle made some allegations. They were investigated and proved false.

All this is on wikipedia which she apparently never heard of. If she had presented this as a freshman in biology, she would have gotten an F.

Her other slides are equally lame, just channeling AIG class lies and not worth the time to parse.

She got off lucky, she should have been fired but merely failed to get her contract renewed.

Troy Britain · 30 March 2008

Nancey Murphy, a religious scholar at Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena, Calif., said she faced a campaign to get her fired because she expressed the view that intelligent design was not only poor theology, but “so stupid, I don’t want to give them my time.” Murphy, who believes in evolution, said she had to fight to keep her job after one of the founding members of the intelligent design movement, legal theorist Phillip Johnson, called a trustee at the seminary and tried to get her fired.
Biochemist Terry M. Gray was tried and convicted of heresy in the mid 90's by the Orthodox Presbyterian Church for daring to suggest that humans have animal ancestors in a review... wait for it... of Phillip Johnson's book Darwin on Trial (1991). Here is Gray's link page to that case.

raven · 30 March 2008

I've discovered that this list really bothers creos. Truth to them is like a cross to a vampire. People have seen this before and might be getting tired of it. I'm going to send it to the NSCE website and see if they will host it. Alternatively, have it hosted as a guest on a blog or website so people can link to it. And if anyone wants to steal it, it is free, took a whole hour of search engine time and is all documentable. The creos are way ahead on body counts, literally and figuratively and this is a critical point. One guy is dead already.
Posting the list of who is really being beaten up, threatened, fired, attempted to be fired, and killed. Not surprisingly, it is scientists and science supporters by Death Cultists. There is a serious reign of terror by Xian fundie terrorists directed against the reality based academic community, specifically acceptors of evolution. I'm keeping a running informal tally, listed below. They include death threats, firings, attempted firings, assaults, and general persecution directed against at least 10 people. The Expelled Liars have totally ignored the ugly truth of just who is persecuting who. If anyone has more info add it. Also feel free to borrow or steal the list. I thought I'd post all the firings of professors and state officials for teaching or accepting evolution. 2 professors fired, Bitterman (SW CC Iowa) and Bolyanatz (Wheaton) 1 persecuted unmercifully Richard Colling (Olivet) 1 attempted firing Murphy (Fuller Theological by Phillip Johnson IDist) 1 successful death threats, assaults harrasment Gwen Pearson (UT Permian) 1 state official fired Chris Comer (Texas) 1 assault, fired from dept. Chair Paul Mirecki (U. of Kansas) 1 killed, Rudi Boa, Biomedical Student (Scotland) Death Threats Eric Pianka UT Austin and the Texas Academy of Science engineered by a hostile, bizarre IDist named Bill Dembski Death Threats Michael Korn, fugitive from justice, towards the UC Boulder biology department and miscellaneous evolutionary biologists. Up to 10 with little effort. Probably there are more. I turned up a new one with a simple internet search. Haven't even gotten to the secondary science school teachers. And the Liars of Expelled have the nerve to scream persecution. On body counts the creos are way ahead.

raven · 30 March 2008

Never heard of the OPC. It is a small fundie splinter group, 28,000 members. The main Presbyterian group has no problem with evolution. A heresy trial in the 20th century! It would be funny if it wasn't so Dark Ages malevolent.
wikipedia OPC: The Orthodox Presbyterian Church (OPC) is a small conservative Presbyterian denomination located primarily in the United States. It was founded by conservative members of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America (PCUSA) who strongly objected to the pervasive Modernist theology during the 1930s (see Fundamentalist-Modernist Controversy). Led by J. Gresham Machen, who had helped found Westminster Theological Seminary, the church attempted to preserve historic Calvinism within a Presbyterian structure. The name signifies its professed adherence to orthodox Christian teachings; it is not related to any branch of Eastern Christianity.
The main group, PCUS, with 2.3 million members supported evolution in 1969.
Evolution Statement In light of recent developments regarding the teaching of the Theory of Evolution in public schools, the Office of Theology and Worship offers the following, the Presbyterian Church U.S. 1969 GA-approved theological statement on the subject. EVOLUTION AND THE BIBLE Primary Reference: GA Minutes 1969: 59-62 Denomination: PCUS Conclusion from the Study Neither Scripture, our Confession of Faith, nor our Catechisms, teach the Creation of man by the direct and immediate acts of God so as to exclude the possibility of evolution as a scientific theory.

SWT · 30 March 2008

raven: The main group, PCUS, with 2.3 million members supported evolution in 1969.
Evolution Statement In light of recent developments regarding the teaching of the Theory of Evolution in public schools, the Office of Theology and Worship offers the following, the Presbyterian Church U.S. 1969 GA-approved theological statement on the subject. EVOLUTION AND THE BIBLE Primary Reference: GA Minutes 1969: 59-62 Denomination: PCUS Conclusion from the Study Neither Scripture, our Confession of Faith, nor our Catechisms, teach the Creation of man by the direct and immediate acts of God so as to exclude the possibility of evolution as a scientific theory.
Minor update -- currently, the main body of the Presbyterian Church is the Presbyterian Church (USA), which resulted from the merger of two Presbyterian denominations, PCUS and UPCUSA. The PC(USA) has affirmed the PCUS position above.

Ichthyic · 30 March 2008

Murphy, who believes in evolution, said she had to fight to keep her job after one of the founding members of the intelligent design movement, legal theorist Phillip Johnson, called a trustee at the seminary and tried to get her fired.

having seen Johnson pop in here on rare occasions, I wonder if he will deign to defend himself on this?

...and I always thought Phil was such a nice guy.

Ichthyic · 30 March 2008

I’m going to send it to the NSCE website

excellent; I'm quite sure there are many more data points to add, especially if you start considering the number of high school teachers that simply bypassed teaching evolution for fear of angry parents.

In fact, I'd bet that it would be a nice part of the NSCE's efforts on the expelled/exposed website they are putting together.

Ichthyic · 30 March 2008

http://www.expelledexposed.com/

Ichthyic · 30 March 2008

yeah, I did that intentionally.

more links the better.

Jedidiah Palosaari · 30 March 2008

Wow. This is my former school, and I took a class from Murphy. Having taken a number of classes there, I'm just shocked that any of the administration or facutly would have an issue with evolution. I would never have suspected it. From some students, yes- but not from administration and faculty. The general impression given in classes (though the topic rarely comes up, of course) is quite the opposite.

Jedidiah Palosaari · 30 March 2008

I don't get why the author of the Washington Post article was using the term "Darwinism". Is he a closet ID supporter?

Troy Britain · 30 March 2008

I found another similar example in Howard Van Till. See: More irony from the ID creationist crowd

Frank J · 30 March 2008

I don’t get why the author of the Washington Post article was using the term “Darwinism”. Is he a closet ID supporter?

— Jedidiah Palosaari
Unfortunately, masochistic pro-science people use the term “Darwinism" all the time. I don't know if the WP author is typical of the clueless media types that unwittingly help anti-evolution activists because their job demands sensationalism, which is "naturally" friendly to pseudoscience. But those who understand evolution, yet insist on using the term as a synonym for "Darwinian evolution" IMO have no excuse. They know that scam artists use "Darwinism" deliberately so that unsuspecting audiences will conflate the scientific explanation with a philosophy that Darwin would surely reject. Just think how much harder their job would be if they either (1) avoided the term because no pro-science people used it, or (2) used it and critics replied with "There they go with that 'Darwinism' caricature again."

FL · 30 March 2008

...having seen Johnson pop in here on rare occasions, I wonder if he will deign to defend himself on this?

Phillip Johnson doesn't need to. PZ Myers has already proved Johnson 100% correct. Take a look:

“It’s the Darwinists who hold the power in academia and who threaten the professional status and livelihoods of anyone who disagrees,” Johnson said. “They feel to teach anything but their orthodoxy is an act of professional treason.”

(PZ sez) "Our only problem is that we aren’t martial enough, or vigorous enough, or loud enough, or angry enough. The only appropriate responses should involve some form of righteous fury, much butt-kicking, and the public firing and humiliation of some teachers, many schoolboard members, and vast numbers of sleazy far-right politicians."

Case closed, baby!!! FL

Ichthyic · 30 March 2008

your quotemining is even more disconnected and disingenuous than usual, FL.

kudos.

FL · 30 March 2008

In fact, let's take things a bit further (Because PZ does.). You ask about Johnson coming here to "defend" himself. But you need to ask about, ahem, somebody else doing so WAY before you even begin to ask about Johnson.

I say, screw the polite words and careful rhetoric. It's time for scientists to break out the steel-toed boots and brass knuckles, and get out there and hammer on the lunatics and idiots.

These are not Johnson's words, if you've ever read any of his books. So whose words are they....? Oh, but you already know, don't you? We all do. ********** So here's a scientist, Mike Gene, who offered the following response to that stuff. You might like it.

Ouch. One can only imagine all the real victims of steel-toed boots, brass knuckles, and hammers, who read this call for action and had to relive their violent past. In our Global Village, those of us who strive to promote Enlightenment and Civilized values stress Peace, Tolerance, and Fairness. Certainly there is plenty of room at humanity’s table for all sorts of viewpoints. I’m worried that Dr. Myers is unintentionally betraying our efforts to promote these values with his reliance on metaphors of violence. When metaphors of violence are used, they only encourage a like response and the cycle of violent language continues, adding to our Culture of Violence. I would plead with Dr. Myers to consider the more enlightened approach of using non-violent metaphors.

Meanwhile, we see the real deal. Johnson's statement is correct.

Andrew L · 30 March 2008

FL:

...having seen Johnson pop in here on rare occasions, I wonder if he will deign to defend himself on this?

Phillip Johnson doesn't need to. PZ Myers has already proved Johnson 100% correct. Take a look:

“It’s the Darwinists who hold the power in academia and who threaten the professional status and livelihoods of anyone who disagrees,” Johnson said. “They feel to teach anything but their orthodoxy is an act of professional treason.”

(PZ sez) "Our only problem is that we aren’t martial enough, or vigorous enough, or loud enough, or angry enough. The only appropriate responses should involve some form of righteous fury, much butt-kicking, and the public firing and humiliation of some teachers, many schoolboard members, and vast numbers of sleazy far-right politicians."

Case closed, baby!!! FL
Johnson claims that "Darwinists" are ruthless oppressors; PZ contradicts this (by saying that real scientists ought to be more energetic in their efforts to get bad science out of the classroom). Case closed? In what way?

PvM · 30 March 2008

FL ignores conveniently the context in which PZ made these statements. He believes that as scientists we should not hold back when we are confronted with scientific ignorance such as Intelligent Design. This has nothing to do with the livelihoods of scientists, but all with good science.

FL · 30 March 2008

Mike Gene is a scientist too, don't forget.

You disagree with his statement?

raven · 30 March 2008

Rudi Boa was stabbed with a knife during an argument with a creo. Unfortunately, it was a real knife not a rhetorical one. He was killed.
Evolution vs creation row ends in stabbing By Adam Bennett | December 14, 2007 A FRUIT-picking trip to southern New South Wales ended in the death of a Scottish backpacker who became embroiled in a bizarre row about creationism and evolution. English backpacker Alexander Christian York, 33, was today sentenced to a maximum of five years jail for the manslaughter of Scotsman Rudi Boa in January last year. Mr Boa, 28, died on January 27 after being stabbed by York at the Blowering Holiday Park, near Tumut. continues

Reginald · 30 March 2008

FL: In fact, let's take things a bit further (Because PZ does.). You ask about Johnson coming here to "defend" himself. But you need to ask about, ahem, somebody else doing so WAY before you even begin to ask about Johnson.

I say, screw the polite words and careful rhetoric. It's time for scientists to break out the steel-toed boots and brass knuckles, and get out there and hammer on the lunatics and idiots.

These are not Johnson's words, if you've ever read any of his books. So whose words are they....? Oh, but you already know, don't you? We all do. ********** So here's a scientist, Mike Gene, who offered the following response to that stuff. You might like it.

Ouch. One can only imagine all the real victims of steel-toed boots, brass knuckles, and hammers, who read this call for action and had to relive their violent past. In our Global Village, those of us who strive to promote Enlightenment and Civilized values stress Peace, Tolerance, and Fairness. Certainly there is plenty of room at humanity’s table for all sorts of viewpoints. I’m worried that Dr. Myers is unintentionally betraying our efforts to promote these values with his reliance on metaphors of violence. When metaphors of violence are used, they only encourage a like response and the cycle of violent language continues, adding to our Culture of Violence. I would plead with Dr. Myers to consider the more enlightened approach of using non-violent metaphors.

Meanwhile, we see the real deal. Johnson's statement is correct.
Hey FL. Jesus called and he said he wants his cross back.

harold · 30 March 2008

FL -
“Our only problem is that we aren’t martial enough, or vigorous enough, or loud enough, or angry enough. The only appropriate responses should involve some form of righteous fury, much butt-kicking, and the public firing and humiliation of some teachers, many schoolboard members, and vast numbers of sleazy far-right politicians.”
I say, screw the polite words and careful rhetoric. It’s time for scientists to break out the steel-toed boots and brass knuckles, and get out there and hammer on the lunatics and idiots.
You present these statements as "evidence" that "Darwinists" have all the power. It's obviously the opposite. These are statements of frustration. Furthermore, I can easily prove that the the statements by PZ Meyers which you quote, with which I agree very strongly despite disagreeing with some of his "anti-religion" diatribes, are rhetorical. It's easy. Neither PZ Meyers nor anyone else is actually, physically kicking the butt of anyone, with hob-nailed boots or anything else. If I thought that PZ was advocating physical violence, bwahahahah, I would oppose these statements. But I very strongly support them, because I think he is advocating vigorous public defense of legitimate science and civil rights. There is no legal limit on what politicians can "believe", but I certainly very strongly encourage people to vote against science-denying politicians. I certainly support your right to live, believe, and worship as you see fit, but I also, to repeat myself, strongly agree with firing and/or suing those who would introduce "intelligent design" into a taxpayer-funded classroom. It's really very simple. I support your right to live, believe, and worship as you see fit, but also my own right to do those things. I won't preach my religion at your kids on your tax dollar, and you won't do that to me, either. Otherwise we have a major problem.

wad of id · 30 March 2008

Mike Gene thinks that ID is not science and that it should not be taught in classrooms. Your point, FL?

FL · 30 March 2008

On another issue, we previously saw that a certain Mr. Paul Mirecki turned out to be The Totally Wrong Poster Boy for Raven's current parano----ummm, current position regarding Raven's allegation of a "serious reign of terror by Xian fundie terrorists."

"I want to be clear that I personally find Professor Mirecki's e-mail comments repugnant and vile. They do not represent my views nor the views of this university. People of all faiths are valued at KU, and campus ministries are an important part of life at the university. "Dr. Mirecki has made the right decision by his withdrawal from the course. He has a right to free speech but he has to realize the revelation of his past e-mails has tainted the environment for his course. He insulted both our students and the university's public, and he misrepresented beliefs of KU's faculty and staff." ---Dr. Robert Hemenway, Chancellor of the University of Kansas

****** But we never did say anything about the late Mr. Rudi Boa being yet another example of Wrong Poster Boyhood. So, read this:

The incident occurred after the pair and Mr Boa's girlfriend Gillian Brown had spent the night drinking at the Star Hotel in Tumut, and an argument broke out between Mr Boa and York about creationism and evolution. When Mr York and the couple returned to the caravan park separately later that night, a scuffle broke out between the two men. Mr York, who was making dinner at the time, had a knife in his hand and stabbed Mr Boa in the chest during the brief altercation. -- theage.com.au

So, rather than a being a pure innocent evolutionist martyr vicitimized by the evil Xian terrorist boogyman, it turns out that evolutionist Mr. Boa did a bunch of drinking with his drinking buddy, and they got into an argument, and the argument got out of hand, which is what sometimes happens when people spend too much time drinking. ****** With both the Rudi Boas and Paul Mirecki cases, one has to ask why Raven continues to leave out certain important details that clearly contradict the "serious reign of terror by Xian fundie terrorists" accusation. But I do agree with him on one point.

People have seen this before and might be getting tired of it.

FL :)

Reginald · 30 March 2008

So, rather than a being a pure innocent evolutionist martyr vicitimized by the evil Xian terrorist boogyman, it turns out that evolutionist Mr. Boa did a bunch of drinking with his drinking buddy, and they got into an argument, and the argument got out of hand, which is what sometimes happens when people spend too much time drinking. FL :)
HELL YEA FL! DRINKING TOTALLY JUSTIFIES STABBING SOMEONE TO DEATH! WOO! This isn't even about science right now. You're completely ignorant of the human condition and you are a sociopath. Please, seriously, seek some help. It is incredibly unhealthy to think the way you do and I pray to you in the name of the Lord if you can rationally degrade human life like this, please seek help.

Dale Husband · 30 March 2008

FL takes everything said by PZ Myers literally because that is how he reads the Bible. Both approaches are equally stupid.

Stanton · 30 March 2008

wad of id: Mike Gene thinks that ID is not science and that it should not be taught in classrooms. Your point, FL?
FL's point is that we should go ahead and teach Intelligent Design "theory" as science, anyhow, as "GODDESIGNERDIDIT" is much easier for the poor little students to absorb into their heads than boring old science or biology textbooks. That, and Intelligent Design "theory" is allegedly science, even though no Intelligent Design proponents, not at the Discovery Institute, and especially not FL, himself, have any motivation to demonstrate that it's science in the first place.

Stanton · 30 March 2008

FL:

People have seen this before and might be getting tired of it.

FL :)
So does this mean you are finally going to demonstrate how Intelligent Design "theory" is a science after all these years, or are you going to stop wasting our time once and for all, and go darken someone else's cyber-doorstep from now on?

SWT · 30 March 2008

FL,

Are you seriously arguing that Mr. Boa's drinking is the cause of Mr. York's actions?

Dale Husband · 30 March 2008

FL rants: So, rather than a being a pure innocent evolutionist martyr vicitimized by the evil Xian terrorist boogyman, it turns out that evolutionist Mr. Boa did a bunch of drinking with his drinking buddy, and they got into an argument, and the argument got out of hand, which is what sometimes happens when people spend too much time drinking. FL :)
Got a problem with drinking? Yell at Jesus himself! He is claimed to have turned water into wine at a wedding feast.

Dale Husband · 30 March 2008

SWT: FL, Are you seriously arguing that Mr. Boa's drinking is the cause of Mr. York's actions?
If he is, he needs to work for GEICO making more stupid commercials to sell its car insurance.

DavidK · 30 March 2008

FL's true identity?
Luskin?
Johnson?
Demski?
Meyers?
(and the other DI/IDists)
I wager it's one of them.

PvM · 30 March 2008

Mike Gene is a pseudonym for someone who may or may not be a scientist. Mike Gene's statement should be filed with his scientific claims.
FL: Mike Gene is a scientist too, don't forget. You disagree with his statement?

Ichthyic · 30 March 2008

“I want to be clear that I personally find Professor Mirecki’s e-mail comments repugnant and vile. They do not represent my views nor the views of this university. People of all faiths are valued at KU, and campus ministries are an important part of life at the university. “Dr. Mirecki has made the right decision by his withdrawal from the course. He has a right to free speech but he has to realize the revelation of his past e-mails has tainted the environment for his course. He insulted both our students and the university’s public, and he misrepresented beliefs of KU’s faculty and staff.”

more quote mining by our local liar for Jesus.

do you even remember what the context was anymore?

moron.

MPW · 30 March 2008

I don't think anyone has pointed out yet that FL's opening comment on this thread is a non-sequitur as regards the original post and Ichthyic's comment that FL was supposedly responding to. PvM's post discussed Murphy's critique of Johnson's book, and the claim that Johnson had subsequently intervened to try to get Murphy fired. Ichthyic speculated on Johnson's possibly turning up here to defend himself. Then FL popped up to throw out an only tangentially related quote from Johnson and proceed to talk as if that was what Ichthyic was saying Johnson has to defend.

In other words, trolling, with the classic elements: Distraction, misdirection, thread derailment, etc.

The quote from PZ which FL presents as proving Johnson's contention is also a bit of a non-sequitur. PZ is clearly talking about public school teachers and elected politicians, not academics in the higher education sense, which I believe is what the Johnson quote is talking about. There's no need to defend evolution among such academics, as creationism is a non-entity among them.

So Johnson is sort of correct in one small part of that quote. Evolutionary scientists do hold the power in the relevant science departments at almost all higher learning institutions, if by that one means they're the ones whose work has been so successful and convincing that scarcely anyone in the field disagrees with it. The only people who disagree are those whose reasoning and work are demonstrably deficient. Thus, shockingly, their careers aren't very successful - not because they challenge some hidebound orthodoxy, but because they refuse to be held to even the minimal standards in their field. In a similar fashion, geocentrists "hold the power" in astronomy departments; germ theorists "hold the power" in medical schools; historians who accept the occurrence of the Holocaust "hold the power" in history departments; etc. So what?

wad of id · 30 March 2008

Is it more hypocrisy from these a pseudoChristian to whine about PZ's statement when they endorse the Vise strategy: http://www.designinference.com/documents/2005.11.Vise_Strategy.pdf

Remember that FL?

waldteufel · 30 March 2008

I really can't figure out why you guys are arguing with an ignorant hack like "FL".

He or she is clearly a bible thumper who is impervious to rational thought.

I say let him/her go read his/her Wholly Babble and enjoy.

The DI creationist hacks are not interested in arguing science. They are christian fundies who have as their goal the destruction of science education in America.

Ignorance and servility are what they want to promote.

raven · 30 March 2008

Fundie Xians have a hobby of publishing lists of people to kill. They occasionally kill them. The toll so far is 7 MDs, 17 attempted murders of MDs, and 200 wounded, some seriously. Plus miscellaneous gays here and there. For evolution acceptors and science supporters, so far two have been beaten up, one killed, and many more threatened with death than just the UC biology faculty, PZ Myers, and Plianka. Fundies like many extremist cultists have a tendency to resort to violence quite often. Not even going to talk about the Salem witch hunts which killed 25 or the medieval witch hunts which killed tens of thousands. Don't ever turn your back on these people.
How to identify fundie xian cultists. It is easy. They lie constantly. They are very, very good at hating. Dumb. They and their leaders frequently publish lists of groups they want to kill. They occasionally kill them. Pat Robertson: wikipedia Hugo Chávez“ I don’t know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It’s a whole lot cheaper than starting a war, and I don’t think any oil shipments will stop. We will find you, we will try you, and we will execute you. I mean every word of it. [Randall Terry, founder of Operation Rescue, at the Aug 8, 1995 U.S. Taxpayers Alliance Banquet in Washington DC, talking about doctors who perform abortions and volunteer escorts My note. Terry’s sympathizers have, in fact, murdered more than a few health care workers. “Pastor Jerry Gibson spoke at Doug Whites New Day Covenant Church in Boulder. He said that every true Christian should be ready and willing to take up arms to kill the enemies of Christian society. bcseweb.org Rushdooney: Our list may not be perfect but it seems to cover those “crimes” against the family that are inferred by Rushdoony’s statement to Moyers. The real frightening side of it is the interpretation of heresy, apostasy and idolatry. Rushdoony’s position seems to suggest that he would have anyone killed who disagreed with his religious opinions. That represents all but a tiny minority of people. Add to that death penalties for what is quite legal, blasphemy, not getting on with parents and working on a Sunday means that it the fantasy ideal world of Rushdoony and his pals, there will be an awful lot of mass murderers and amongst a tiny population. We have done figures for the UK which suggest that around 99% of the population would end up dead and the remainder would have each, on average, killed 500 fellow citizens. Chalcedon foundation bsceweb.org. Stoning disobedient children to death.Contempt for Parental Authority: Those who consider death as a horrible punishment here must realise that in such a case as ….cut for length Rev. William Einwechter, “Modern Issues in Biblical Perspective: Stoning Disobedient Children”, The Chalcedon Report, January 1999 When The Hate Comes From ‘Churches’ ASHLAND, Ore. - A recent spate of crimes points up a growing connection between hateful actions and organizations calling themselves churches. Two brothers from northern California reportedly linked to such a group were charged this week with the killing of two gay men near Redding. Benjamin Matthew Williams and James Tyler Williams also are suspects in the firebombing of three synagogues in the Sacramento area last month. According to personal acquaintances as well as law enforcement officials, the Williams brothers were involved in Christian Identity, a religion that holds Jews and nonwhites to be subhuman and is closely tied to the Aryan Nations white-supremacist group based in northern Idaho. Meanwhile, officials are investigating the links between Benjamin Smith and the World Church of the Creator. Over Independence Day weekend in Illinois and Indiana, Smith shot Asians, Jews, and an African-American (killing two and injuring nine) before killing himself. Fundie cultists frequently publish lists of groups they plan to or would like to kill. From above quotes, we have MDs, “enemies of christian society” (whoever they are), heresy etc., disobedient children but only by stoning, gays, Jews, nonwhites, the topic of this thread-scientists and others. If the truth is ugly, way it goes. By their words, ye shall know them, The Book. To make things worse, they occasionally do murder people. This doesn’t happen with mainstream christian denominations that I know of. Our church always talked about world peace and eliminating poverty. If you would have suggested drawing up a list of groups to hate and kill and arms and ammmunition to buy, well, it would be inconceivable.

Gary Hurd · 31 March 2008

For evolution acceptors and science supporters, so far two have been beaten up, one killed, and many more threatened with death than just the UC biology faculty, PZ Myers, and Plianka.
Raven, You are not supposed to admit on Panda's Thumb that Mirecki was beat-up. It upsets the conservatives.

raven · 31 March 2008

Speaking of fundies saying weird things. Michael Korn has toned it down a bit. He now just wants to set up an inquisition and deport all the scientists. Note the date, March 14, 2008. Posted on the PZ blog. This is a tortured soul and really needs to get help and sort out his life and thoughts.
Dear Prof. Myers, Thank you for posting my poem. Although it is not the most eloquent piece of literature, it does come from the heart, which is what counts. I guess you sensed that and wanted to share it with your friends! I recently read through the Ameican Declaration of Independence. I was surprised to see three references to a Creator God: (1) "When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation." (2) "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights;" (3) "And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor." Now considering that the Declaration declares God, our money is inscribed with "In God We Trust", our songs sing out "God Bless America", and our Pledge of Allegiance affirms that we are "One Nation Under God", it seems that people who hold to atheistic views like Darwinian Naturalism (that nature created itself) are not only foolish scientists, but they are unpatriotic Americans as well! I am looking forward to the day when Congress will convene an American Inquisition to force scientists who believe in Devilution either to recant their views and to be properly reeducated or to forfeit their citizenship and to be deported to a place like Communist China, which will appreciate your atheism and hatred of God. Of course, it would be preferable for these scientists to willingly subject themselves to reeducation without resort to an Inquisition. But rest assured that the day is coming when the stubborn arrogance of the Darwinists, who hold themselves above normal scientific accountability, will force our society to take firm action to protect itself from their dangerous prevarications. But you can relax: unlike the Roman Catholic Inquisition, the American Inquisition will not burn recalcitrant sinners against true scientific reason at the stake; it will merely strip them of their citizenship and expel them from these sacred shores! Posted by: Michael Korn | March 14, 2008 11:03 AM #90THIS IS A PROMISE, NOT A THREAT! Posted by: Michael Korn | March 14, 2008 11:30 AM #91THIS IS A PROMISE, NOT A THREAT! Just like Jesus promised so many millennia ago, "'Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom"? Posted by: Brownian, OM | March 14, 2008 11:44 AM #92THIS IS A PROMISE, NOT A THREAT! Michael, this thread is 3 months old. No one is looking at it. They go dead in a day as they slip down the list. You shouldn't be posting your threats (or promises) anyway. People already think you are crazy and the police are looking for you. And FWIW, your language and sentiments are not exactly what good Jews or Xians would express. Posted by: raven | March 14, 2008 11:45 AM #93Michael Korn fulfills the prophesy of scripture! He's the Wandering 'Tard! Posted by: Brownian, OM | March 14, 2008 11:45 AM #94Is there a way to trace this Korn nutcase's IP address? Isn't there still a warrant out for his arrest on those death threats (and it looks like he's making more now)? I don't suppose Mike's actually read the U.S. Constitution. You know, the document that actually lays out the workings of American government? The one that explicitly forbids religious tests for public office? The one that doesn't mention his precious god even ONCE? Or is he going to desperately grasp at the date? Really, if the intent was to create a "Christian Nation" (whatever that term means, if anything at all), why would it not be stated as such in the Constitution? I have never seen a single one of these theocrats even attempt to answer this question. Has anyone? The idiot also isn't aware that "In God We Trust" wasn't put on coins until 1864, or on paper money until 1957. And he clearly hasn't read the ORIGINAL version of the Pledge of Allegiance, which had no mention of any god. Of course, theocratic traitors never bother to learn these things. Who needs facts when you can Lie For Jesus™? Michael Korn, you lust for the murder of American citizens. You seek the overthrow of the United States government, the destruction of our Constitution, and the abolishment of the freedom our soldiers fought and died for. You, sir, are a traitor. YOU are the one who is Un-American. Get the fuck out of my country. Posted by: phantomreader42 | March 14, 2008 1:59 PM #95i am out of your country. i don't live in the polluted fatuous bubble that you call home. i was born here and it is my country too. may the best man win... try arguing the science next time, big boy. see this: http://scienceagainstevolution.org/pogge.htm he is a military scientist and veteran who isn't afraid to write the truth about the drop headed darwinist traitors to america. you are contaminating our country with vile english heresies. you are a lobster back red coat torry and unwelcome on these sacred shores. Posted by: Michael Korn | March 14, 2008 5:57 PM #96YAY! More crazy! Posted by: MAJeff, OM | March 14, 2008 5:59 PM #97PS i didnt say we have to be mandated as a Christian nation. just a God-fearing one. and if you dont like that go suck some commie bottom in beijing. where you and other traitors belong.

raven · 31 March 2008

Raven, You are not supposed to admit on Panda’s Thumb that Mirecki was beat-up. It upsets the conservatives.
??? Not sure what you mean. Before my time but I just went by internet documents. BTW, it is almost impossible for people to beat themselves up, a hard wired reflex. We use this as a test for consciousness in comatose patients. When people do damage themselves, they use tools, blades and guns mostly.

Jedidiah Palosaari · 31 March 2008

FL:

...having seen Johnson pop in here on rare occasions, I wonder if he will deign to defend himself on this?

Phillip Johnson doesn't need to. PZ Myers has already proved Johnson 100% correct. Take a look:

“It’s the Darwinists who hold the power in academia and who threaten the professional status and livelihoods of anyone who disagrees,” Johnson said. “They feel to teach anything but their orthodoxy is an act of professional treason.”

(PZ sez) "Our only problem is that we aren’t martial enough, or vigorous enough, or loud enough, or angry enough. The only appropriate responses should involve some form of righteous fury, much butt-kicking, and the public firing and humiliation of some teachers, many schoolboard members, and vast numbers of sleazy far-right politicians."

Case closed, baby!!! FL
FL, I really appreciate what you said here. By stating "case closed", and not responding at all to the original post, you have, by all the rules of debate, effectively conceded the point of the original post- that Dr. Murphy and others like myself have either lost jobs or been in danger of losing them because of our support of evolution. While it is true that others here have effectively addressed your post and shown how false it was, your initial statement very effectively created the own goal of showing the truth of the original post. If only every IDist made it this easy.

Ichthyic · 31 March 2008

??? Not sure what you mean. Before my time but I just went by internet documents.

yes, inside issue from long ago.

suffice it to say there was a schism here over the issue that never healed.

for what it's worth, i still think Gary had the right of it (from the PoV that the 'thumb should be taking wrt to the incident), regardless of whatever the details of the case turned out to be afterwards.

Ichthyic · 31 March 2008

I really can’t figure out why you guys are arguing with an ignorant hack like “FL”.

we're not.

he's arguing with himself.

we're just laughing at him.

I say let him/her go read his/her Wholly Babble and enjoy.

the problem is he doesn't enjoy his wholly babble; he insists on coming here to whine on an at least weekly basis. One might almost think he considers this a pulpit or something.

frankly, I've been asking for years that he be auto-booted to the BW (he hasn't said anything honest or original that I've noticed in over a year now), but Pim seems to have grown fond of him for some reason totally unclear to me still.

I hope he doesn't grow fond of Keith, too. I come here less and less as it is.

Ichthyic · 31 March 2008

Of course, it would be preferable for these scientists to willingly subject themselves to reeducation without resort to an Inquisition.

I do keep wishing that these psychos would stop reading 1984 as if it were an instruction manual.

Rolf · 31 March 2008

FL: Mike Gene is a scientist too, don't forget. You disagree with his statement?
Of all the stupid things to say, this. My head aches, it hurts, I suffer. Kurt Wise is a scientist too, and so is John Baumgardner. See? It is entirely possible to be a real Harvard educated scientist and a YEC creationist at the same time! And Mike Gene, he is a dyed-in-the-wool Intelligent Design supporter. Since your main argument here also is quite offtrack, maybe your problem is a case of the "not being able to see the difference between apples and oranges" syndrome? I don't think I've ever seen an argument of yours that seemed much relevant to the matter at hand. Maybe you should sit down and really apply some of the "What is my problem?" modus of thinking?

Frank J · 31 March 2008

And Mike Gene, he is a dyed-in-the-wool Intelligent Design supporter.

— Rolf
Not that it detracts one iota from his 100% anti-science stance, but it's worth mentioning that "Mike Gene" has defended common descent perhaps even more strongly that Mike Behe. BTW, I think that it has been ruled out that they are one and the same, despite name similarity, but I'm not certain.

Frank J · 31 March 2008

D'Oh!

Disregard my last comment.

I was thinking of DaveScot, not Mike Gene. Though I vaguely recall the latter also conceding a lot to evolution.

Something about those 4-letter names...

phantomreader42 · 31 March 2008

So, FL, for the record, you admit that Johnson tried to have Murphy fired, for nothing more than disagreeing with him. Further, you cannot bring yourself to muster up any moral objection to this act. However, you scream bloody murder at the top of your lungs if you hallucinate some example of "Darwinists" doing what you celebrate Johnson doing. Also, the record shows that you have no problem whatsoever with brutal beatings or even MURDER of scientists simply because they dare disagree with you. Thanks, FL, for showing us that you're not only a lying hypocrite, but totally batshit fucking insane.
FL:

...having seen Johnson pop in here on rare occasions, I wonder if he will deign to defend himself on this?

Phillip Johnson doesn't need to. PZ Myers has already proved Johnson 100% correct. Take a look:

“It’s the Darwinists who hold the power in academia and who threaten the professional status and livelihoods of anyone who disagrees,” Johnson said. “They feel to teach anything but their orthodoxy is an act of professional treason.”

(PZ sez) "Our only problem is that we aren’t martial enough, or vigorous enough, or loud enough, or angry enough. The only appropriate responses should involve some form of righteous fury, much butt-kicking, and the public firing and humiliation of some teachers, many schoolboard members, and vast numbers of sleazy far-right politicians."

Case closed, baby!!! FL

Rrr · 31 March 2008

MPW:< ... The only people who disagree are those whose reasoning and work are demonstrably deficient. Thus, shockingly, their careers aren't very successful - not because they challenge some hidebound orthodoxy, but because they refuse to be held to even the minimal standards in their field. In a similar fashion, geocentrists "hold the power" in astronomy departments; germ theorists "hold the power" in medical schools; historians who accept the occurrence of the Holocaust "hold the power" in history departments; etc. So what?
I suspect you didn't really mean that part? :)

Rrr · 31 March 2008

Oh carp. I fsck'd my previous comment. Not earth-shattering; just a gentle prod about mistaking geocentrism for the other "tehory" in MPW's otherwise wise comment above.

raven · 31 March 2008

FL justifying murder: So, rather than a being a pure innocent evolutionist martyr vicitimized by the evil Xian terrorist boogyman, it turns out that evolutionist Mr. Boa did a bunch of drinking with his drinking buddy, and they got into an argument, and the argument got out of hand, which is what sometimes happens when people spend too much time drinking.
FL is saying that drunk creationists with knives are dangerous. I agree. Sober creationists with knives are also dangerous. Drinking isn't an excuse for murder. ******
FL: With both the Rudi Boas and Paul Mirecki cases, one has to ask why Raven continues to leave out certain important details that clearly contradict the “serious reign of terror by Xian fundie terrorists” accusation.
Two reasons. 1. They don't contradict the case whatsoever. You are mistaking your fond hopes for reality, again. 2. Space. We're already up to 10 here and I should add more. Van Til and Gray might fit in.
But I do agree with him on one point. People have seen this before and might be getting tired of it.
BINGO!!! If FL is tired of my list of persecutions by creationists, it must be both true and valuable. Truth to a creationist is like a cross to a vampire.

Philip Bruce Heywood · 31 March 2008

Been some time since I visited the old Panda's Thumb, could scarecely recognize it, what with the deluxe format and no sign of Lenny Flank - well, don't rely on me, I didn't see his name with a quick scan. I see from an entry not far at all above here, you are still doing the world a service, keeping some types off the street. Must be cold at night in the northern hemisphere, people stay in -- don't want what happened here in Aus. with that stabbing murder - argument began over origins philosophy, got too hot, booze, lack of sleep, far from home - it's hot here, even at nights. Picking fruit gives you aches if you aren't fit. Magistrate thought the stabbing might have been unintentional. I mean, if anyone takes these differences of opinion to heart,or personally, they have a problem. A man describes himself by the way he writes.

I merely mention in passing by that Phillip Johnson for years has declined to report on my publications; P.Z. Meyers is seemingly in the same category; In scientific terms the Origins Question has been settled for 8yrs; and yes, someone probably is doing someone a service by keeping a non-existent controversy on the go. That dead man's relatives mightn't think so. The uninitiated could visit www.creationtheory.com to discover these facts themselves.
We're constantly updating there and a couple of very gratifying new arrivals have been the HOX genes in fish and the Silicon isotopes, Earth-Moon-Mars-Vesta.
Cheers, everybody - you are arguing over a dead topic.

Rrr · 31 March 2008

Philip Bruce Heywood: Been some time since I visited the old Panda's Thumb, could scarecely recognize it, what with the deluxe format and no sign of Lenny Flank - well, don't rely on me, I didn't see his name with a quick scan.
I'm kind of new here myself, so I haven't had the opportunity to read you before. But, for what it might be worth, and as you had probably noticed, there is a weird poster calling itself FL... Just my 0.02 $CurrencyUnit. OK, I'll just go back to my bear's nest, roll over and sleep some more now.

c-serpent · 31 March 2008

FL = Fafarman, Larry?

Torbjörn Larsson, OM · 31 March 2008

BINGO!!!
Now, that's a new game. Nice contrast to whack-a-creo, and it also has this huge advantage over gatecrashing their reduction ad hitlerum propaganda "conferences" - we can do it anytime.
you are arguing over a dead topic
How head cracked insane must a person be to not only push crackpot theories on a science blog, but take continuing scientific research as an indication of "a dead topic"? So has anyone cared to estimate that woo site? After 10 s I placed my personal estimate to 0.5 Tc, smack middle in crackpot central. That was 10 valuable seconds of my life, damn!

FL · 31 March 2008

FL = Fafarman, Larry?

Clever indeed! But nope. There's only one FL, and it's me dude!! Side note for Raven: go ahead and send that laundry list of doomed darwinists to NCSE. But do NOT be surpris'd if they put some good hearty editing on it before they let that thing be associated with their good (heh-heh) name!! FL

Dale Husband · 31 March 2008

FL:

FL = Fafarman, Larry?

Clever indeed! But nope. There's only one FL, and it's me dude!! Side note for Raven: go ahead and send that laundry list of doomed darwinists to NCSE. But do NOT be surpris'd if they put some good hearty editing on it before they let that thing be associated with their good (heh-heh) name!! FL
And that is what FL is reduced to after being totally whipped by the rest of us here. I guess that means we need never take him seriously ever again! Victims of persecution are victims of persecution, and one's personal views of their habits or attitudes are irrelevant. Only FL's bigotry makes him think otherwise. Oh, FL, how soon could you start working for GEICO's advertising department?

John Kwok · 4 April 2008

Raven,

Here's the information on the Turkish intellectual who was assassinated for a number of reasons, including his acceptance of evolution:

"NCSE Reports, Vol 19, No. 6, Nov/Dec 1999, has three separate articles on Islamic creationism, mostly Turkish. The article that specifically mentions the murdered intellectual who opposed the creationists (I think he was a scientist, but I'm not sure. His name was Ahmet Taner Kisali.) is "Fundamentalist Bedfellows: Political Creationism in Turkey," by Arthur M. Shapiro, pp. 15-17. The NCSE article is a reprint from "The New Leader," Mar/Apr 2000, 83(1): 13-18. And yes, those dates are correct. NCSE's publication schedule is so far behind schedule, that their 1999 Report was indeed published after The New Leader's 2000 issue."

Am quoting from another NCSE member who had sent me this information. Incidentally, Kisali's name is more commonly listed as Kislali.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

John

Jedidiah Palosaari · 4 April 2008

I've been speaking with my old professor, Nancey Murphy, over at Fuller, on email, and she's confirmed my suspicions. The Washington Post article was not entirely precise. To whit:

That I came close to being fired is an exaggeration. Philip Johnson phoned a powerful trustee and complained about me. The trustees discussed my "case" and there was so much support from the administration that the issue dropped there. So it's not Fuller, but rather the ID people who wanted me out.

Later she stated

Fuller has always been very supportive, even though the events caused them to lose major donations! I will be instituting a new course in the fall that deals more directly with science and theology issues.

So, as I suspected, this was not something the Fuller faculty, administration, or trustees were behind. Fuller's just not the kind of institution to have such a narrow view as supporting Intelligent Design, to the extent that the courses cover anything scientific. But I am excited to hear that there will be shortly a course at Fuller that will be more directly looking at theology as it pertains to science, and presumably, considering the instructor, evolution.

Jedidiah Palosaari · 4 April 2008

(Sorry- I should mention that I had Dr. Murphy's permission to share the previous information.)