This odd marine worm, Xenoturbella bocki, is in the news right now, and I had to look it up in Pechenik's Biology of the Invertebrates(amzn/b&n/abe/pwll) to remind myself of what it was. Here's the complete entry:
Xenoturbella bocki
This marine worm, first described in 1949 as an acoel flatworm and later claimed as either an early metazoan offshoot or a primitive deuterostome, has recently been affiliated with primitive bivalve molluscs, based upon a study of gamete development (oogenesis) and an analysis of sequence data from both 18S rRNA and mitochondrial genes. Little is known about its reproductive mode, and developmental studies that might help to resolve the phylogenetic issues are just starting to be reported. A second species was described in 1999.
The animals are up to 4 cm long, vermiform (worm-shaped), and covered by locomotory cilia. They have no digestive tract, and indeed no organs at all. Their only conspicuous morphological feature, other than their cilia, is a statocyst for determining orientation. To date, they have been collected only off the coasts of Sweden and Scotland, in sediments at depths of 20 m to 100 m.
That's it. Part of that is now known to be wrong: the data showing an affinity to the molluscs is an artifact, caused by the fact that it somehow eats bivalves, and partly digested clam material contaminated the samples. Otherwise, not much is known; I've found papers describing the presence of oocytes inside the animal, but no one as far as I know has actually observed its development. It's a strange, mysterious blob of a worm.
Continue reading "Strange worm, Xenoturbella" (on Pharyngula)
5 Comments
Jedidiah Palosaari · 4 November 2006
No organs? I wonder if it could be a new kind of Parazoa.
normdoering · 5 November 2006
MeanDean · 5 November 2006
So, has it been offered a job at the California Dept. of Transportation's planning department yet? It seems to be qualified.
(Sorry, couldn't resist.)
Wing|esS · 6 November 2006
Any idea how long it will take to evolve? Perhaps isolation of different populations will produce both a primitive worm and a primitive mollusc.
Wing|esS · 6 November 2006
Woah my bad... the mollusc part is wrong. But it's still an interesting worm isn't it? Perhaps it has room for improvement.