Jerry Coyne has a nice, long, thorough analysis of ID in The New Republic. Not much new for the initiated, but a very good primer for newbies to the issue, touching everything from science (or lack thereof) to the religious roots of ID. (I am not sure, but it may require free registration to read)
Did I say it’s long? It’s long.
Coyne on ID in The New Republic
↗ The current version of this post is on the live site: https://pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/08/coyne-on-id-in.html
6 Comments
steve · 11 August 2005
bugmenot username and password for tnr.com:
u: 33477b
p: 33477b
steve · 11 August 2005
I need a special firefox extension to hide the obligatory reference to Scopes which has to lead off every evolution/ID article. It's so tediously repetitive at this point. Kind of like if you're in physics, eventually, mentions of Schrodinger's Cat starts to cause involuntary eye-rolling.
N.Wells · 11 August 2005
Long but very good. Thanks for announcing it.
steve · 11 August 2005
One thing this piece reminds me of, is how good these judges have been. They consistenly see the creationist tricks for what they are--fundamentalist attempts to deform science teaching to fit the bible.
steve · 11 August 2005
The Sanity Inspector · 16 August 2005
Dembski copied and posted the whole thing on his website--what a jerk.