Titan image: Holy moly

Posted 14 January 2005 by

↗ The current version of this post is on the live site: https://pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/01/titan-image-hol.html

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/TECH/space/01/14/huygens.titan/top.main.titan.shoreline.jpg

Wow. 

Huygens success = image = drainage pattern = rivers = rain = oceans.

(From CNN.)

Sometimes a picture really is worth a thousand words and a few billion dollars.

Since I need a few more lines to provide space for the image:

Wow.

Wowsers.

(etc.)

34 Comments

Nick (Matzke) · 14 January 2005

Well, if that image was taken from an elevation of 2 feet rather than several kilometers, I will look rather silly, but if someone has a better explanation than drainage patterns, I am listening.

Nick (Matzke) · 14 January 2005

Here is a picture from the surface:

First image from Titan

~DS~ · 14 January 2005

We have a surface level side image going up at UTI any sec.

Nick (Matzke) · 14 January 2005

Yep, the first image was taken during the descent:

Huygens at Titan 2 January 14, 2005 This is one of the first raw, or unprocessed, images from the European Space Agency's Huygens probe as it descended to Saturn's moon Titan. It was taken with the Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer, one of two NASA instruments on the probe.

Nick (Matzke) · 14 January 2005

Much more on Huygens pictures at Unscrewing the Inscrutable.

Frank J · 14 January 2005

Look close enough and you can see the images of John, Paul, George and Ringo. ;-)

David Heddle · 14 January 2005

That is just so cool.

~DS~ · 14 January 2005

The rocks or ice chunks or whatever look pretty polished on the top surface. I'd guess we're seeing a layer of floating scum, looks like maybe open 'ocean' or sludge plains in the foreground.

~DS~ · 14 January 2005

Raw images at http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~kholso/data.htm. We'll have some of the better ones up in a jiffy.

~DS~ · 14 January 2005

Check out number two Exquisite!

David Heddle · 14 January 2005

Man, I'm at a loss for words. Awesome.

DougT · 14 January 2005

Damn. I'm not getting my work done today because the Titan stuff is so interesting. It's also great for people on both sides of the evolution/ID debate to be standing in awe of the pictures together. {group hug}

Grand Moff Texan · 14 January 2005

Well, if that image was taken from an elevation of 2 feet rather than several kilometers, I will look rather silly, but if someone has a better explanation than drainage patterns, I am listening.

Well, you could start here.

[ducks!]

Nick (Matzke) · 14 January 2005

Yeah, lots more images. Rivers and ocean, or frozen versions thereof.

Bayesian Bouffant · 14 January 2005

Conclusive proof that NASA and ESA are faking the Huygens landing on Titan. Compare this alleged image from the surface of Titan with http://tinyurl.com/4heasthis photo taken near Minneapolis, Kansas, USA.

Point proven, QED, case closed.

(um, yeah. I'm joking.)
The prohibition on hyphens in URLs is a bear.

Bayesian Bouffant · 14 January 2005

#$%@#$%#$% can't edit posts, can't insert hyphens in URLS, how far am I suppoed to go for a joke?

alleged photo from Titan

photo from Kansas

DougT · 14 January 2005

Nick-
For some of the images that show the beautiful drainage patterns, have you been able to find out anything about the scale of what they are showing?

~DS~ · 14 January 2005

Doug,

I could be wrong (I've been up for two days}. I believe the ESA said most of the ariel shots are in the range of one pixel to 10-40 meters. Dunno about the side shots yet.

Nick (Matzke) · 14 January 2005

Yeah, they were taken during the parachute descent, so they must be a kilometer or two up at least.

Don T. Know · 14 January 2005

Hey, I think I see an outline of the Holy Mother!

Mike Hopkins · 14 January 2005

Since the above link has 404 errors instead of raw images:

Give me hundreds of raw images

The images are out of order.

Nice to see the Europeans wised up and fairly quickly released raw images. It was not plan a few days ago.

--
Anti-spam: Replace "user" with "harlequin2"

Jon H · 14 January 2005

I think the Mars rovers have spoiled me.

I WANT MORE PICTURES!

All those raw pictures seem to be differently calibrated views of the same thing, or some such.

Mike Hopkins · 14 January 2005

I think the Mars rovers have spoiled me. I WANT MORE PICTURES! All those raw pictures seem to be differently calibrated views of the same thing, or some such.

— Jon H
No they don't. Look again. Skip to the 500s. Remember what I said about them being out of order? -- Anti-spam: Replace "user" with "harlequin2"

Mike Hopkins · 14 January 2005

Look at this one for example

--
Anti-spam: Replace "user" with "harlequin2"

~DS~ · 15 January 2005

Update: 9:53 EST Good review of the Surface Science Package or SSP. Surface temp is a balmy -180 C. Titan has something like a tropopause with a min temp of -200 C at an altitude of 50 kms and possibly a thermocline/ dense cloud layer; ghostly sonic reflections were received from several kms above the surface. Penotrameter data suggests Huygens may have landed in a soft slurry of methane and or water ices with a thin fragile crust. Huygens tilt data indicates a rest angle of about 20 degrees off level, and rock solid steady; no bobbing or wave action.

Update: ESA Systems Science, Damstadt Germany, 6:03 EST AM Jan 15. Data indicates the presence of water ice, methane, ethane, acetylene, and 'possibly' other, heavier, hydrocarbons on the surface. In the side-surface shot in the previous frame (see photo two, side-surface view), the objects (ice blocks) are in the 10-20 cm range; they are fairly close to Huygens; the DISR is approximately 40 cm above the surface looking down and out at them at an angle of perhaps 30-45 degrees off level. Optical band wavelength data presented suggests the surface color is a bright yellow with perhaps a touch of orange; almost looks like the hue of raw sulfur in places.

Wayne Francis · 15 January 2005

This is one of the first raw images returned by the ESA Huygens probe during its successful descent. It was taken from an altitude of 16.2 kilometres with a resolution of approximately 40 metres per pixel. It apparently shows short, stubby drainage channels leading to a shoreline.

— NASA
16.2k and a resolution of about 40 metres per pixel.

Mike Hopkins · 15 January 2005

The surface in color

(Usual disclaimer: camera does not see the same way you do so the colors might not be completely "correct.")

--
Anti-spam: Replace "user" with "harlequin2"

frank schmidt · 15 January 2005

Composite view at the ESA site:

http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Cassini-Huygens/index.html

What a picture. Can't wait for more.

~DS~ · 15 January 2005

Udate: 1:52 EST. Rough mosiacs and color pic from ESA via The Two Perecnt Company Rants.

DaveScot · 16 January 2005

Let me be the first to put forward the theory that Titan and Earth descended from a common ancestor.

ROFL!

I kill me sometimes.

Flint · 16 January 2005

DaveScot:

I think Velikovsky beat you to it.

Bayesian Bouffant · 16 January 2005

I kill me sometimes.

— DaveScot
Don't get GWW's hopes up.

Wayne Francis · 16 January 2005

Let me be the first to put forward the theory that Titan and Earth descended from a common ancestor.

— DaveScot
Umm you are way late. Astronomers, cosmologists etc have been saying just this for decades. The Earth and Titan both come from the same halo that surrounded our sun early in the solar system's formation ~6 billion years ago. Those elements formed from a massive supernova that exploded a bit further in the past. But then you can deny that any systems out there where created via GAs so I'm sure you can deny this too. Please talk to David Heddle if you are in doubt about radiometric dating etc.

joe larson · 17 January 2005

fricken awesome. some of the ones from the decent look like you could add some greens, blues and golds hues and make it look just like flying over an earthly coastline. awesome.

now were are the lgm?